Be the Student, or Be the Lesson

From James in the hinterlands (“Prosecutor and Defense Attorney Since 1968″), regarding Robb Fickman’s guest post1 on Ken Anderson:

Brilliant, of course, but I’m connecting for a separate reason.  I have recently started a blog and would like to cross pollinate with people such we yourself who obviously see the world the same as I do.  So I’d like to start by re-printing your blog with your permission, and to have a little “about the author” at the end.  If you’re interested, please let me know.  My fledgling blog is keywordrichblogname.com.  Thanks, and thanks for the very well expressed opinion; I’ve been having trouble with a number of defense lawyers who feel that 10-days is a signal of something.  Maybe it is, but to get that deal then, at least they should have forced him to publicly admit what he did, like so many persecutors press pleading defendants to do instead of NC pleas.

Keep blogging.

James is making things up as he goes along. I’ve been blogging for six and a half years. I have a pretty good idea what works and what doesn’t. James has this idea of republishing other people’s work with “a little ‘about the author’ at the end.” This does not work. It’s nice of James to ask: many people would just do it without asking, reasoning that I must want more “exposure,” but I’m not interested in my content being used to fluff someone else’s blog, so the answer was no.

Of course since he was nice enough to ask, I also offered James some free advice, from someone who didn’t just discover blogging:

No.

Who is advising you on this “cross-pollinating” thing? Because the way to do it is not to reprint other people’s stuff. It’s to join the conversation. Comment on other people’s blogs, disagree with them, write your own blog posts with links to their stuff.

This is work.

I think James wants this to be effortless—republish someone else’s posts, add a little “about the author” to the end, and boom: instant blog! The barriers to entry are low, but blogging isn’t effortless. Nothing worth doing ever is.

James didn’t much like that answer:

I have to say I’m a little surprised by this angry response, as the goal of my blog is to get important information out there, whomever writes it, with attribution, so that the public sees the reality of justice in America, and that’s why I proposed an about-the-author postscript.  I’d like to think that it’s just that you’re having a bad day, so I won’t take the acrimonious tone personally.

Don’t lose any sleep over it.

Why is it that when you tell people the truths they don’t want to hear, you are “angry” and “acrimonious”?

The problem is that if James is filling his blog with other people’s work, nobody is going to link to it and nobody is going to read it. If he really wanted to “get important information out there,” rather than “fill a webpage with keywordy goodness” he would follow my advice and join the discussion. Scott Greenfield has written about this more than once. Gideon lamented, Slowly but surely, the blawgoshpere [sic] is moving away from actual conversation and closer to pure marketing, but that was five years ago.

We can explain it to you, but we can’t understand it for you.


  1. No, I do not accept guest posts from strangers. Robb is a special exception. He and I have a deal: neither of us goes to jail for contempt alone. Since he’s likely some day to be my celly, I try to keep him happy. 

About Mark Bennett

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Be the Student, or Be the Lesson

  1. “Why is it that when you tell peo­ple the truths they don’t want to hear, you are ‘angry’ and ‘acrimonious’?”

    You’d have to ask Scott Greenfield, that seems to be his standing M.O.. He only likes commenters who show up to give him a “tummy rub.”

    • Having observed Mr. Greenfield’s manner — and having felt his barbs — I’d say he’s more blunt and abrasive than anything else. (And to his credit, he seems to know it.) He just doesn’t suffer fools gladly — but when said fools say something wise, however out of character, he salutes them too.

      (And yes, I got here via one of Mr. Greenfield’s links.)

  2. Nalora says:

    People online make broad assumptions based on very little data. In the geek world there is an entire meme dedicated to “U Mad Bro?”

    http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/u-mad

    I sometimes believe it is because it is a little screen, like the television set. This makes us all characters they get to know via 30 minutes a week of viewing.

  3. Robb Fickman says:

    Mark and I do have an understanding that when we go to jail we will be cellies.
    At this point it’s not even if we go to jail; It’s, when we go to jail. It’s not that either of us is lawbreakers. Neither of us is. It’s simply a reflection of our prediction of the inevitable reaction of some bully robe that we have cornered. When bullies get cornered in their own mess they lash out. As we are in the business of trying to get judges to follow the law & their own Code of Coduct, odds are one will overreact. There is a Gandhian metaphor that we both adhere to, but I will not quote it here.

    Marks only mistake is his attempt to keep me happy. I am a born malcontent. Happiness is not a goal. I hate the saying ” it’s all good”. Like hell it is. Mark likes having me around because next to me he looks cheery.

    I will be blogging Monday re my least favorite fascist Texas Senator.
    Robb Fickman

  4. Josh C says:

    Blunt answers, unpadded with courtesy, come accross as rude. That is a feature of English. See e.g. http://www.courts.state.hi.us/docs/CADR/CADR_LaBelle_MitigatedSpeech.pdf

    It’s like failing to use the subjunctive in German.

  5. Pingback: Law Geek: Writing is Thinking » Defending People

  6. Kirk Taylor says:

    Got here from Windypundit, and as I said there, I agree so much that I’m going to copy this post to my blog. Need to get this information out there!

  7. Pingback: How High Is Over The Top? | Simple Justice

  8. another mark says:

    I’ve read angry responses. I’ve written angry responses. Yours was not one of them.

    He’s the angry one for having the balls to ask you to copy your entire site.

    [Edited your name. You don't get to be "mark" here.]

  9. Pingback: On Mitigated Speech » Defending People

  10. Pingback: Is Your Online Lawyer Maverick-y? | Simple Justice

  11. Pingback: Rakofsky 2.0: Code-Name "Maverick" | RHDefense: The Law Office of Rick Horowitz

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>