TCDLA’s Position on Reciprocal Discovery

Letter from Bobby Mims of Tyler, President President-Elect of the Texas Criminal-Defense Lawyers Association, to the sponsor of Texas Senate Bill 91 and his Chief of Staff:

Senator Rodney Ellis & Mr. Brandon Dudley:

I appreciate the time that you and Sen. Ellis invested in today's analysis of the SB91. We the members of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association understand and appreciate Senator Ellis' dedication to the cause of justice in Texas. Senator Ellis has an unblemished record standing on behalf of the citizen accused for over 20 years. Senator Ellis is one of the Texas patriots for justice in Texas for Texans. The 3200 members of criminal defense lawyers are unwavering in the defense of the Constitution and to the protection of due process and will not be compromised for the sake of political expediency.

I am directed by the Board of Directors of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association to advise that any form of reciprocal discovery in criminal cases is unacceptable to the 3200 members of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and to most of the criminal defense trial lawyers of Texas. By participating in a meeting of 12 independent individuals to "mark up" a proposed bill should not be interpreted in any way to endorse this measure in any form by TCDLA.

Any legislation that requires the defendant to produce any evidence or disclose anything in the defense lawyer's file is an anathema to justice and to a free and independent people.

You personally and in your role as a State Senator have been a bulwark against an overbearing state in protection of the most vulnerable in our society for many years. You, Senator Ellis, have stood for right vs. wrong and your reputation is stainless and your constituents depend and count upon you for justice.

Recently, there has been a movement to "compromise" by certain interests groups purporting to speak for the criminal defense bar and for the accused by individuals who have an interest that is obtained by interests outside of the State of Texas. The Texas Defender Service seeks, for some reason, a reciprocal discovery bill to be passed by the legislature. They do not speak for TCDLA nor for any other criminal defense group other than themselves.

I can assure you that the 3200 members through the TCDLA will vigorously oppose any such legislation and assure you that the Texas Defenders Service and their spokeswoman does not speak for the TCDLA nor any significant number of actual defenders of citizens. Indeed, they are supposed to be an resource group to assist capital defense counsel in capital murder cases. They are very good at this assistance but they rarely to trial level representation of capital cases. Their advice on capital murder defense is valuable as a resource. However, it is the criminal defense trial lawyers who have the difficult mission of defending the citizen accused in Texas courtrooms. The proposed discovery bill promoted by the TDS will make this important mission even more difficult. However, the purpose of the justice system is to convict the guilty and acquit the innocent. The prospects of wrongful convictions will be increased under this bill rather than lessened.

I am requesting that you consider and vigorously oppose any measure that would mandate any rule or law or regulation that would invade the file or province of the counsel for the defendant in a criminal case. After all we must stand for something and this is the "something"!

I can assure you that if a reciprocal discovery statute is adopted by the State of Texas legislature that the members of the TCDLA will do everything possible to comply until it invades the province of counsel, the constitutional rights of a defendant and the right to present a defense…and frankly this is all unnecessary merely to merely assuage the need of a certain interest group to justify their existence to an outside contributor of a grant to "clean up Texas."

I can expand on the purported issue that this legislation seeks to address at your convenience…suffice it to say that this seeks to cure an ill and impose on prosecutors a remedy for something that the prosecutors of Texas are curing themselves without the intervention of the legislature…

Thank you very much for your service to Texas and to justice.

About Mark Bennett

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to TCDLA’s Position on Reciprocal Discovery

  1. Mr. B., thanks for sharing this ‘outstanding’ letter by Mr. Bobby Mims of Tyler, President of the Texas Criminal-Defense Lawyers Association, addressed directly to the
    sponsor(s) & supporter(s) of one of the most blatant & bazaar bill(s) Texas has ever seen. Not only did he; clarify the TDCLA’s membership stance, he verified the function of a group that was previously thought to be comprised of actual criminal defense trial attorneys / lawyers by many in the non-law degreed community.

    If time permits maybe you and / or another will clarify one sticky point of concern. That being, *when he speaks on behalf of 3200 humans as being on the same page, is he doing so after a vote was called or simply just reacting to a horrible bill assuming they are? Nevertheless, since Divorce & Estate specialists are allowed to Dabble in the criminal defense niche (felony jury trials) – On behalf of their doomed FJT clients’, I’m calling on their membership to join the fight to extinguish this crapola.

    Asking, due the profession being comprised of: Rs’, Ds’ & Is’. alike with some former ADAs’ jumping ship and possibly being TCDLA members with varying views held over via training and / or allegiances’ to previous creeds & mottos. In any case (clarified or not), this ‘letter’ has done more to repair the profession’s reputation & restore the public’s faith than anything ever done in the past, for it documents their feelings with a rational and logical response. Senator Ellis, you have the floor and some splainning to do & it’s a slippery slope. Thanks.

  2. Wouldn’t it have just been shorter to write, “Dear Sen. Ellis: We don’t want a seat at the table. Instead, we’re taking our ball and going home. Just have the prosecutors association tell you what they want and pass that because we have chosen to make ourselves irrelevant. Sincerely, etc., etc..”?

  3. I’m borrowing this for my tumblr. all the kids are doing it. thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>