Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

TCDLA’s Position on Reciprocal Discovery">TCDLA’s Position on Reciprocal Discovery

Let­ter from Bobby Mims of Tyler, Pres­i­dent President-Elect of the Texas Criminal-Defense Lawyers Asso­ci­a­tion, to the spon­sor of Texas Sen­ate Bill 91 and his Chief of Staff:

Sen­a­tor Rod­ney Ellis & Mr. Bran­don Dudley:

I appre­ci­ate the time that you and Sen. Ellis invested in today’s analy­sis of the SB91. We the mem­bers of the Texas Crim­i­nal Defense Lawyers Asso­ci­a­tion under­stand and appre­ci­ate Sen­a­tor Ellis’ ded­i­ca­tion to the cause of jus­tice in Texas. Sen­a­tor Ellis has an unblem­ished record stand­ing on behalf of the cit­i­zen accused for over 20 years. Sen­a­tor Ellis is one of the Texas patri­ots for jus­tice in Texas for Tex­ans. The 3200 mem­bers of crim­i­nal defense lawyers are unwa­ver­ing in the defense of the Con­sti­tu­tion and to the pro­tec­tion of due process and will not be com­pro­mised for the sake of polit­i­cal expediency.

I am directed by the Board of Direc­tors of the Texas Crim­i­nal Defense Lawyers Asso­ci­a­tion to advise that any form of rec­i­p­ro­cal dis­cov­ery in crim­i­nal cases is unac­cept­able to the 3200 mem­bers of the Texas Crim­i­nal Defense Lawyers Asso­ci­a­tion and to most of the crim­i­nal defense trial lawyers of Texas. By par­tic­i­pat­ing in a meet­ing of 12 inde­pen­dent indi­vid­u­als to “mark up” a pro­posed bill should not be inter­preted in any way to endorse this mea­sure in any form by TCDLA.

Any leg­is­la­tion that requires the defen­dant to pro­duce any evi­dence or dis­close any­thing in the defense lawyer’s file is an anath­ema to jus­tice and to a free and inde­pen­dent people.

You per­son­ally and in your role as a State Sen­a­tor have been a bul­wark against an over­bear­ing state in pro­tec­tion of the most vul­ner­a­ble in our soci­ety for many years. You, Sen­a­tor Ellis, have stood for right vs. wrong and your rep­u­ta­tion is stain­less and your con­stituents depend and count upon you for justice.

Recently, there has been a move­ment to “com­pro­mise” by cer­tain inter­ests groups pur­port­ing to speak for the crim­i­nal defense bar and for the accused by indi­vid­u­als who have an inter­est that is obtained by inter­ests out­side of the State of Texas. The Texas Defender Ser­vice seeks, for some rea­son, a rec­i­p­ro­cal dis­cov­ery bill to be passed by the leg­is­la­ture. They do not speak for TCDLA nor for any other crim­i­nal defense group other than themselves.

I can assure you that the 3200 mem­bers through the TCDLA will vig­or­ously oppose any such leg­is­la­tion and assure you that the Texas Defend­ers Ser­vice and their spokes­woman does not speak for the TCDLA nor any sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of actual defend­ers of cit­i­zens. Indeed, they are sup­posed to be an resource group to assist cap­i­tal defense coun­sel in cap­i­tal mur­der cases. They are very good at this assis­tance but they rarely to trial level rep­re­sen­ta­tion of cap­i­tal cases. Their advice on cap­i­tal mur­der defense is valu­able as a resource. How­ever, it is the crim­i­nal defense trial lawyers who have the dif­fi­cult mis­sion of defend­ing the cit­i­zen accused in Texas court­rooms. The pro­posed dis­cov­ery bill pro­moted by the TDS will make this impor­tant mis­sion even more dif­fi­cult. How­ever, the pur­pose of the jus­tice sys­tem is to con­vict the guilty and acquit the inno­cent. The prospects of wrong­ful con­vic­tions will be increased under this bill rather than lessened.

I am request­ing that you con­sider and vig­or­ously oppose any mea­sure that would man­date any rule or law or reg­u­la­tion that would invade the file or province of the coun­sel for the defen­dant in a crim­i­nal case. After all we must stand for some­thing and this is the “something”!

I can assure you that if a rec­i­p­ro­cal dis­cov­ery statute is adopted by the State of Texas leg­is­la­ture that the mem­bers of the TCDLA will do every­thing pos­si­ble to com­ply until it invades the province of coun­sel, the con­sti­tu­tional rights of a defen­dant and the right to present a defense…and frankly this is all unnec­es­sary merely to merely assuage the need of a cer­tain inter­est group to jus­tify their exis­tence to an out­side con­trib­u­tor of a grant to “clean up Texas.”

I can expand on the pur­ported issue that this leg­is­la­tion seeks to address at your convenience…suffice it to say that this seeks to cure an ill and impose on pros­e­cu­tors a rem­edy for some­thing that the pros­e­cu­tors of Texas are cur­ing them­selves with­out the inter­ven­tion of the legislature…

Thank you very much for your ser­vice to Texas and to justice.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

4 Responses to “TCDLA’s Position on Reciprocal Discovery”

  1. Mr. B., thanks for shar­ing this ‘out­stand­ing’ let­ter by Mr. Bobby Mims of Tyler, Pres­i­dent of the Texas Criminal-Defense Lawyers Asso­ci­a­tion, addressed directly to the
    sponsor(s) & supporter(s) of one of the most bla­tant & bazaar bill(s) Texas has ever seen. Not only did he; clar­ify the TDCLA’s mem­ber­ship stance, he ver­i­fied the func­tion of a group that was pre­vi­ously thought to be com­prised of actual crim­i­nal defense trial attor­neys / lawyers by many in the non-law degreed community.

    If time per­mits maybe you and / or another will clar­ify one sticky point of con­cern. That being, *when he speaks on behalf of 3200 humans as being on the same page, is he doing so after a vote was called or sim­ply just react­ing to a hor­ri­ble bill assum­ing they are? Nev­er­the­less, since Divorce & Estate spe­cial­ists are allowed to Dab­ble in the crim­i­nal defense niche (felony jury tri­als) — On behalf of their doomed FJT clients’, I’m call­ing on their mem­ber­ship to join the fight to extin­guish this crapola.

    Ask­ing, due the pro­fes­sion being com­prised of: Rs’, Ds’ & Is’. alike with some for­mer ADAs’ jump­ing ship and pos­si­bly being TCDLA mem­bers with vary­ing views held over via train­ing and / or alle­giances’ to pre­vi­ous creeds & mot­tos. In any case (clar­i­fied or not), this ‘let­ter’ has done more to repair the profession’s rep­u­ta­tion & restore the public’s faith than any­thing ever done in the past, for it doc­u­ments their feel­ings with a ratio­nal and log­i­cal response. Sen­a­tor Ellis, you have the floor and some splain­ning to do & it’s a slip­pery slope. Thanks.

  2. Wouldn’t it have just been shorter to write, “Dear Sen. Ellis: We don’t want a seat at the table. Instead, we’re tak­ing our ball and going home. Just have the pros­e­cu­tors asso­ci­a­tion tell you what they want and pass that because we have cho­sen to make our­selves irrel­e­vant. Sin­cerely, etc., etc..”?

  3. I’m bor­row­ing this for my tum­blr. all the kids are doing it. thanks.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply