Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Ladies: Is Compliance Sexy?

(H/T up front to Scott Green­field and his ostreoid Sim­ple Jus­tice, in the ABA’s Blawg 100 once again.)

“I … watch him work­ing at the stove.  His easy con­cen­tra­tion, eco­nom­i­cal move­ments, set­ting up in me a pro­ces­sion of sparks and chills.”

– Alice Munro, Dear Life, accord­ing to this post by Stew­art Baker.

I am not a woman, but I am a cook. And I can imag­ine why a cook’s easy con­cen­tra­tion and eco­nom­i­cal move­ments might set up in a woman a pro­ces­sion of sparks and chills: it’s genetic.

Cook­ing invokes core male com­pe­ten­cies that men are genet­i­cally pro­grammed to exer­cise and women are genet­i­cally pro­grammed to admire: con­trol of fire, con­trol of knives (dan­ger­ous things), cre­ative think­ing, pro­vid­ing for others.

We are pro­grammed thus because the man who could con­trol fire and dan­ger­ous things, think cre­atively, and pro­vide for oth­ers was, in pale­olithic times when our pro­gram­ming was set, more likely to keep a mate and off­spring alive long enough for the off­spring them­selves to repro­duce. These com­pe­ten­cies arose not by gov­ern­ment fiat but by nat­ural selection—the guys who didn’t have them didn’t have as many off­spring who repro­duced as those who did.

Com­pli­ance, by con­trast, is not a core male competency.

I can imag­ine no rea­son that see­ing a male coop­er­at­ing with the orders of a bureau­crat would make a female dewy for the com­ply­ing male. For the bureau­crat, perhaps—command is another core male competency—but not for the complier.

So when Stew­art Baker writes of the rea­son he tries (along with the mouse in his pocket?) to com­ply with TSA bureau­crats’ orders with a min­i­mum of wasted movements:

In part we do it to keep our place in the hier­ar­chy of guys.  But in the end, what we’re really hop­ing for is an Alice Munro moment — that our easy con­cen­tra­tion and eco­nom­i­cal move­ments will set up in some­one “a pro­ces­sion of sparks and chills,” fol­lowed a few pages later by, well, what we deserve for all that demon­strated competence.

I think, “the poor schlub must not know how to cook.” Com­par­ing cook­ing to going through secu­rity is like… well, it’s a metaphor that defies syllogism.

Baker also com­pares going through secu­rity to shoot­ing trash­can bas­kets with dis­carded papers—another inapt metaphor—“throwing things” is a core male com­pe­tency; “being a bot­tom” isn’t.

Baker writes,

There’s no doubt that it’s vir­u­lent. As a pri­vacy skep­tic and national secu­rity con­ser­v­a­tive, I’m used to hos­tile com­ments. But it’s only when I defend TSA that the com­ments go beyond hos­tile to vis­ceral and occa­sion­ally even spittle-flecked.

Why is that?

Well, Stew­art: I think it’s prob­a­bly because you’re a freak who thinks he’s going to impress the ladies with your excel­lence at sub­mis­sion. Granted, there is some­one for every­one, and there are undoubt­edly ladies who are look­ing for com­pe­tent feck­less­ness in a mate, but my hunch is that they are in a tiny minority.

Ladies, what say you? Is there some­thing about see­ing a guy go through TSA secu­rity with no wasted move­ment that gets your juices flowing?

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

5 Responses to “Ladies: Is Compliance Sexy?”

  1. Randall Villarreal says:

    True Story:

    I’ve been told by plenty of girls that they love guys who meekly debase them­selves in public.

    /notatruestory

  2. Anna Durbin says:

    Ok, I am a “lady” and I will speak up. Uh, NO. I can­not say that I am excited by spine­less jel­ly­fish. Of course, any­one stu­pid enough to get arrested by jok­ing that he had a bomb would not do it for me either. I kind of like the peo­ple who go through it mut­ter­ing about the waste of secu­rity the­ater and how the ter­ror­ists win when we let this hap­pen. But then, I have been anti-authoritarian as long as I can remember.

  3. My heart flut­ters and my knees get weak — you’re free to con­tem­plate other phys­i­o­log­i­cal reac­tions, although I won’t dis­cuss them here — for a guy who will go on a road trip with me and a car full of off­spring, tra­vers­ing approx­i­mately 2000 road miles (each way), because I want to visit peo­ple but refuse to put myself (or the afore­men­tioned off­spring) through TSA’s Secu­rity Theater/get groped by blue-shirted thugs. That shows strength and for­ti­tude and it’s unde­ni­ably sexy.

    Unques­tion­ing com­pli­ance with demean­ing and point­less rou­tines, obe­di­ent sub­mis­sion to author­ity? Con­tem­plat­ing that behav­ior makes me feel dis­dain and brings on phys­i­o­log­i­cal reac­tions like: look­ing away, cross­ing my arms, face wrin­kling up like I’m smelling some­thing rot­ten, and I turn away while say­ing “ewwww.”

  4. Anna Durbin says:

    I’m with Kather­ine. And frankly, I don’t think I am that much of an out­lier on this issue.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply