Highlights of audience comments:
• “The ‘Interesting Legal Questions’ only served to confuse me.” (There’s a fine line between interesting and confusing; I cross it occasionally.)
• “Presentation was well done. What a shame that his ‘biased liberalism’ had to be so blatant it detracted from an otherwise good discussion.” (You stand up and fight for the right of devout “judge not” Christians to serve on juries, and they call you a biased liberal.)
• “Speaker has unique and interesting style kind of like Led Zeppelin.” (I am not entirely sure what that means. It’s been a long time since I rock and rolled.)
Here’s the video, if you’re interested.