Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Algebra?

Lis­ten­ing to Diane Rehm today, I heard two peo­ple dis­cussing whether alge­bra should be a manda­tory course for all Amer­i­can stu­dents (stream it).

At the time I was prepar­ing for the instal­la­tion of an auto lift in my garage. To plan for this blue-collar mechan­i­cal task I needed a lit­tle bit of trigonom­e­try (?=arccos(90.25-x)/2/24.5, where x is the width of the car between lift points); with­out alge­bra I would never have got­ten to trigonometry. 

Engi­neers need alge­bra, mechan­ics need alge­bra, archi­tects and cab­i­net­mak­ers need alge­bra. Lawyers don’t need alge­bra much, but we don’t need more lawyers.

I won­der what the alge­bra doubters think today’s stu­dents will be doing twenty years from now. Par­tic­i­pat­ing in some vapor­ware “knowl­edge econ­omy” that has noth­ing to do with manip­u­lat­ing num­bers or phys­i­cal things?

Amer­ica is already doing a lousy job of train­ing peo­ple to make and fix things. Drop­ping the alge­bra require­ment would be just another step down the path toward pro­found national mediocrity.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

13 Responses to “Algebra?”

  1. Ross says:

    First, I am envi­ous of your lift. Every well equipped garage needs one, along with the large com­pres­sor to run the air wrenches that make tak­ing tires off so much easier.

    Every stu­dent ought ot have to take at least two semes­ters of alge­bra, one of geom­e­try, and one of trig. Those classes help teach you to think, which is sorely lack­ing in this age of teach­ing to a stan­dard­ized test. What hap­pens when those of us who can think die, and there’s no one left to give the answer to the living?

    • Mark Bennett says:

      Have you tried a recharge­able impact wrench? Plenty of torque for lug nuts (unless you’re work­ing on big trucks, in which case my lift won’t be big enough anyway).

      I had six weeks of alge­bra and trig. That seemed to be enough.

  2. Michael Stuart says:

    Unbe­liev­able. Per­haps they’re con­cerned the dearies’ self-esteem might suf­fer? Should we also offer alter­na­tives to Eng­lish, say, and teach inco­her­ent grunting?

    Shades of “Planet of the Apes”…minus the svelte mute girl. Obese, grunt­ing troglodytes bum­bling around grunting.

    I use trig for car­pen­try; quick, what’s the edge length of a 3/4 ply­wood board cut at a 30 degree angle? Nifty to know cos/sin/tan sometimes.

    A math­e­mat­i­cally illit­er­ate pop­u­lace is more mal­leable to global warm­ing pro­pa­ganda and fis­cal shenanigans.

  3. Kirk Garner says:

    I heard that pro­gram this morn­ing, too. The jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for drop­ping the alge­bra require­ment was to pre­vent dropouts. 25% of stu­dents who start high school fail to grad­u­ate. Some kids just can’t get algebra–will never get algebra–and we shouldn’t make them hate school just because of a one-size-fits-all aca­d­e­mic requirement.

    I wish the schools would teach some more common-sense math appli­ca­tions. (This wouldn’t have to be in place of alge­bra, it could be in addi­tion to alge­bra.) For instance, stu­dents need to learn the math that will allow them to com­pare cell phone con­tracts, for exam­ple; auto­mo­bile financ­ing and the annual cost to drive dif­fer­ent mod­els of cars; per­sonal bud­get­ing; credit card com­par­isons, fees, and inter­est rates; things like that. These top­ics could include alge­braic func­tions, but in a prac­ti­cal rather than abstract application.

    Stu­dents need to learn about fig­ures and statistics–specifically, how sta­tis­tics can be used decep­tively. For exam­ple, we used to hear that 50% of auto fatal­i­ties involve drunk dri­vers. (I think those num­bers have declined.) That bare sta­tis­tic tells us noth­ing. To know if that 50% is high or low, we need to know what per­cent­age of all dri­vers is drunk at any given time. If 75% of all dri­vers are drunk, then dri­ving drunk would be safer than dri­ving sober. An absurd exam­ple, to be sure, but it shows very sim­ply that peo­ple who cite sta­tis­tics often allow lis­ten­ers to make assump­tions, often in order to per­suade or deceive.

    Sorry for the MEGO. I thought it was a good topic for discussion.

  4. Bob Mabry says:

    It’s a scan­dal that school­ing with­out alge­bra could be counted an edu­ca­tion. It’s also a scan­dal that one has to go through a great deal of school­ing to get a job for which the school­ing is not needed. Get­ting the skill set to match the job is harder and harder.

  5. Mike Trent says:

    Why are you work­ing on cars? Sheesh, I spent enough hours under cars grow­ing up. Never again.

  6. Laurel Spahn says:

    Math helps every­one with critical-thinking skills. There are dif­fer­ent ways to get to an answer in math; if one way isn’t work­ing, math teaches us to look at the prob­lem from a dif­fer­ent angle. This has helped me as a lawyer.

  7. Justin T. says:

    It is appalling to me how lit­tle most lawyers know about math, espe­cially con­sid­er­ing how sim­i­lar math and the prac­tice of law are in prin­ci­ple. Both involve prov­ing some­thing that you only intu­itively think is true, using a log­i­cal, step-by-step approach, jus­ti­fy­ing every sin­gle argu­ment you make. Fur­ther­more, you’re only allowed to use a basic set of rules to jus­tify your think­ing. Can you explain the result in a way that is easy to under­stand and impos­si­ble to refute? Math teaches these skills, as well as skills like fol­low­ing com­plex direc­tions and cit­ing all your work. Remov­ing math instruc­tion from the cur­ric­ula of Amer­i­can high schools would be a huge blow to our nation’s edu­ca­tional future

    • Michael Stuart says:

      @Justin–remember, though, that is the pur­pose of government-funded education.

      In your life you don’t* fund busi­nesses anti­thet­i­cal to your inter­ests; nor does gov­ern­ment.
      Easily-led, igno­rant sham­bling masses are the inten­tional end-product.

      * well, not vol­un­tar­ily any­way. We all pay taxes put to uses anti­thet­i­cal to our best interests…

Leave a non-anonymous Reply