Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Emmette Flynn, and Methodist Medical Center of Oak Ridge

In Feb­ru­ary I wrote two posts about Dr. Emmette Flynn, the San Angelo, Texas sur­geon who per­formed a non­con­sen­sual (and med­ically unnec­es­sary, though med­ical neces­sity wouldn’t jus­tify a pro­ce­dure against the com­pe­tent client’s wishes) proc­toscopy on an arrestee at the behest of the police who brought the arrestee to the hos­pi­tal along with a search war­rant that order the police to present the accused, Mr. Gray, to

qual­i­fied med­ical tech­ni­cian to exam­ine [Gray] for the con­ceal­ment of con­trolled sub­stances and to remove said con­trolled sub­stances from his body in accor­dance with rec­og­nized accepted med­ical pro­ce­dure as described in [Hethcock’s] affidavit.

What’s impor­tant about this is that the order didn’t order Dr. Flynn to do any­thing. He could have told the pigs to fuck off and, because Mr. Gray refused the pro­posed treat­ment, he had an eth­i­cal oblig­a­tion to do so.

I imme­di­ately filed a com­plaint with the Texas Med­ical Board against Dr. Flynn. A cou­ple of weeks later I got a let­ter from the Texas Med­ical Board explain­ing that my com­plaint had been dis­missed because there was no eth­i­cal lia­bil­ity for “expert med­ical opin­ion offered in a con­tested civil and/or crim­i­nal mat­ter.” Some­one at TMB had skimmed my com­plaint, which referred to the Fifth Cir­cuit opin­ion, and con­cluded that the com­plaint was about some­thing other than it was about.

(An aside: it dri­ves me crazy that bureau­cra­cies send let­ters signed [Name of Bureau­cracy], with no human being’s name or sig­na­ture attached. Noth­ing good ever comes of bureau­crats not being held accountable.)

So I appealed, reex­plain­ing what I had explained before.

Six weeks later I got a let­ter say­ing that the board was recon­sid­er­ing the matter. 

Last week I got a notice that the Texas Med­ical Board had opened an inves­ti­ga­tion of Emmette Flynn, with an inves­ti­ga­tor assigned. I also got a let­ter from the inves­ti­ga­tor (with a name and a sig­na­ture! huz­zah!) ask­ing if I would waive my right of con­fi­den­tial­ity in my complaint.

I admit that it hadn’t occurred to me that I had a right of con­fi­den­tial­ity in my com­plaint. I want Dr. Flynn to know who filed the com­plaint, and I want him to know why. I want him to bitch about me to his fel­low doc­tors at the golf course. I want them to know that if they coop­er­ate with the author­i­ties in vio­la­tion of their oaths, some ass­hole criminal-defense lawyer three hun­dred miles away might well go out of his way to make them wish they hadn’t.

I want doc­tors to know that if they choose to help the police rather than respect their patients’ wishes, those sto­ries are going to be the first thing poten­tial patients read about when they google the doc­tors’ names.

I don’t know how seri­ous the Texas Med­ical Board is (Mr. Gray was, after all, an onlya), but I hope Dr. Flynn is wor­ried about his liveli­hood. If he’s not, I hope deal­ing with a TMB com­plaint is enough of a nui­sance that next time the cops want him to scope some poor schmoe who doesn’t want to be scoped he can man up and say no.

Maybe Dr. Flynn is a very nice man who is kind to his chil­dren and loves his dog, but he made the wrong choice, and the point needs to be made in a way that will make an impres­sion not only on him but also on every other doc­tor in the United States who might find him­self in a posi­tion to make the same choice.

Which brings us to Dr. Michael LaPaglia of Oak Ridge, Ten­nessee, who in Feb­ru­ary 2011 tes­ti­fied about his non­con­sen­sual paral­y­sis and rec­tal exam of an onlya named Felix Booker and, four months later, was coerc­ing a guy named Antwan Gul­ley to con­sent to a rec­tal exam. LaPaglia is appar­ently the Oak Ridge Police Department’s go-to guy for rec­tal exams. Unfor­tu­nately for Dr. LaPaglia, this time he came up empty-handed, so Mr. Gul­ley isn’t an onlya. Gul­ley has filed a civil law­suit against Dr. LaPaglia and oth­ers, seek­ing dam­ages and an injunction.

Good for Gul­ley. And good for his lawyer, Robert Jol­ley, who also rep­re­sented Mr. Booker (and is rep­re­sent­ing him on appeal in the Sixth Cir­cuit. Appel­late briefs here.) I hope they take Dr. LaPaglia down. And if they don’t, I hope they make him so mis­er­able that next time he tells the Oak Ridge cops, “find your­selves another patsy with a med­ical license.”

(If Jol­ley okays it, I’ll file a com­plaint with the Ten­nessee Board of Med­ical Exam­in­ers against LaPaglia as well.)

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

5 Responses to “Emmette Flynn, and Methodist Medical Center of Oak Ridge”

  1. TJIC says:

    Awe­some work!

  2. Mike Paar says:

    When I read of you doing great things like this I real­ize why you are my idol. Your courage, respect for the Con­sti­tu­tion and the law, and your will­ing­ness to get involved regard­less of reper­cus­sions inspires me to do more. Kudos Mark, and know that there are many out here who admire your guts and tenac­ity and under­stand that you are work­ing to make this coun­try a bet­ter place for everyone.

  3. Ric Moore says:

    Thank you for your ser­vice. The guys in uni­form aren’t the only ones defend­ing Liberty.

  4. david ryan says:

    Too bad you’re not on Face­book any more… def­i­nitely hit the like but­ton on this one!

  5. Marc Meyer says:

    Cre­at­ing busi­ness for me, eh? {well, if physi­cians would call me, that is — I gen­er­ally work with nurses … )

Leave a non-anonymous Reply