Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Live by the Hatchet, Die by the Hatchet

In Harris-County-Prosecutor Land, there is a strong cur­rent of belief that Kelly Siegler a) should have won the 2008 Repub­li­can Pri­mary instead of Pat Lykos; b) should be DA now; and c) should chal­lenge Lykos for the posi­tion in 2012. Pros­e­cu­tors who don’t find the Lykos DA’s Office as ami­able a place to work as the Rosen­thal DA’s Office was see Siegler as their white knight, poised to ride in and bring back those good old days.

But Pat Lykos is polit­i­cally for­mi­da­ble. Siegler could no more beat her in a pri­mary now than she did in 2008. Nor could Mike Ander­son, whose name is also bandied about by the wist­ful Rosenthal-Office alumni as a poten­tial DA. Unless, that is, Lykos’s office were rocked by a scan­dal that the pub­lic might care about.

A scan­dal like an indict­ment against the sit­ting DA.

A grand jury would be needed to hand down such an indict­ment, and in the ordi­nary course of things, with Har­ris County grand juries closely con­trolled by Har­ris County pros­e­cu­tors, a grand jury would never do so.

Now, how­ever, we have a break­away grand jury, out of the 185th Dis­trict Court. They kicked the pros­e­cu­tors out of the room, then asked for and received a spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor and a term exten­sion. They have been talk­ing to wit­nesses who know things about the Hous­ton Police Department’s bro­ken BAT (Breath Alco­hol Test­ing vans).

We usu­ally don’t know who is serv­ing on a grand jury. Serendip­i­tously, we know who the fore­man of this par­tic­u­lar grand jury is:

Trisha Pol­lard, a mem­ber of the Board of Regents for the Texas State Uni­ver­sity Sys­tem who helped SHSU develop STAFS, was recently elected fore­man of the 185th Grand Jury in Har­ris County. She arranged for a group to tour STAFS and the SHSU regional crime lab in The Wood­lands last week to get an idea of how evi­dence is studied.

(Huntsville Item.)

Here’s the grand-jury fore­man being sworn in as an SHSU Regent (in the grand-jury office!) by Devon Anderson:

Who is Anderson’s hus­band? Why, he’s the afore­men­tioned Mike Ander­son, rumored to be con­sid­er­ing run­ning for DA.

But wait: there’s plenty more to feed the con­spir­acy the­o­rists. Pol­lard is con­nected to the SHSU regional crime lab, which could surely ben­e­fit from hav­ing a friend run­ning the Har­ris County DA’s Office. Judge Susan Brown orga­nized this grand jury; her hus­band, Marc Brown (who is now a Dis­trict Court Judge as well—Pollard con­tributed a lit­tle to his cam­paign fund), had at first been demoted from divi­sion chief to chief by Lykos, and later been repro­moted but stuck in the posi­tion of Grand Jury Chief. (Marc Brown, while he was a pros­e­cu­tor, con­tributed $500 to Kelly Siegler’s cam­paign fund when she was run­ning against Lykos. Wheels within wheels.)

Now two pros­e­cu­tors—Carl Hobbs and Steve Morris—have been called in to the 185th Dis­trict Court to show cause why they should not be held in con­tempt for pos­sess­ing grand-jury tran­scripts. Carl and Steve may be the first DAs to be thrown under the Lykos bus in this episode. The first, but not—I suspect—the last. Why would Lykos need to throw pros­e­cu­tors under the bus? Polit­i­cal expe­di­ency. Bet­ter for Lykos that Hobbs and Mor­ris should go down for fol­low­ing orders than that the law gov­ern­ing grand-jury secrecy should be too-strictly adhered to.

And you can expect a good deal more dig­ging to find out who knew what when. Here’s one of the spe­cial pros­e­cu­tors whom Judge Susan Brown appointed to advise the grand jury on the matter:

Not the one at the lectern: that’s Kelly Siegler, announc­ing her res­ig­na­tion from the DA’s Office after los­ing the pri­mary elec­tion to Pat Lykos. Appoint­ing Siegler as spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor would be too bla­tant. The spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor, Stephen St. Mar­tin, is Siegler’s sup­porter on the far right.

St. Mar­tin donated a healthy $3,000 to Siegler’s cam­paign when she was fight­ing Lykos for the Repub­li­can nom­i­na­tion. Also, Lykos kicked him out of the Spe­cial Crimes Divi­sion of the DA’s Office, and then pub­licly snubbed him when the FBI gave him an award.

I sus­pect that feel­ings between Lykos and St. Mar­tin are mutual.

St. Mar­tin should never have been appointed to inves­ti­gate the Lykos DA’s Office. No mat­ter how incor­rupt­ible he is, the appear­ance of impro­pri­ety is a prob­lem. If the grand jury indicts Lykos or mem­bers of DA’s Office man­age­ment, the pub­lic will won­der whether bad blood between St. Mar­tin and Lykos con­tributed; if he does not, peo­ple will won­der whether St. Mar­tin pulled his punches in an excess of cau­tion. A local lawyer with­out the Lykos-related bag­gage that St. Mar­tin has (Wen­dell Odom?) should have been appointed spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor, or a hired gun from out of town (not this hired gun), or even the Attor­ney General.

Where does this put Pat Lykos? In an uncom­fort­able spot, I sus­pect, with no room to com­plain. She is, after all, no stranger to pros­e­cu­tions with the appear­ance of impro­pri­ety. You might even say that, when it comes to Har­ris County hatchet jobs, she set the stan­dard.

(Bonus read­ing: Butt-Head did not approve this hatchet job.)

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

12 Responses to “Live by the Hatchet, Die by the Hatchet”

  1. Anna Durbin says:

    Sheesh, you Tex­ans live nov­els, don’t you? And I thought all that Grisham stuff was phony.

  2. NEVER Siegler. Sorry but she is B A D bad. Peo­ple think she is great because she is so mean but that is because they have not been on the receiv­ing end with one of their inno­cent loved ones. (And that cap­i­tal mur­der dis­missal — well, that guy got lucky is all I can say.)

    Hav­ing Kelly would be like hav­ing John Bradley back here again … (and I’m glad he decided to go be the big fish in a small pond. He was a poo when he was here and has obvi­ously got­ten worse.)

    Bad as Lykos is, at least she has run off most of the cheaters in the office. There are still a few, and there are still lots of prob­lems, but she has got­ten rid of a bunch of — junk.

  3. Robb Fickman says:

    A spe­cial pros­e­cu­tor needs to be inde­pen­dent. I am no Lykos fan. Quite the oppo­site. Stephen St Mar­tin is a good guy, but per­haps the wrong man for this job.

    The right man for this job is for­mer spe­cial crimes pros­e­cu­tor, and great defense lawyer– The Real Bob Ben­nett. If The Real Bob Ben­nett could be talked out of retire­ment, no one would ques­tion the integrity of the process. There is not a soul alive with more integrity than the Real Bob Ben­nett. Both sides of the bar and the judi­ciary respect him. He is the man for this job, if peo­ple are smart enough to offer it to him and he is will­ing to do this. Peo­ple who have been around might recall he was the lead pros­e­cu­tor the last time a Crim­i­nal Dis­trict Court Judge got indicted indicted for tak­ing a $50,000 bribe.

    Robb Fick­man

  4. John Regan says:

    Some­how I knew the pop­ulist run­away grand jury story was just too good to be true. It remains at the level of myth, urban leg­end. Like Big­foot. Too bad.

  5. Luci Davidson says:

    So Cyn­thia, would those “cheaters” be peo­ple like me?

  6. Mark,
    That photo is actu­ally of Kelly announc­ing that she was going to run for D.A. There wasn’t a press con­fer­ence when she resigned.

  7. Derick Smith says:

    Kelly appar­ently was not as open file minded when she was head of the mis­de­meanor divi­sion. Being pri­mar­ily a Fort Bend County Defense attor­ney I was han­dling a case in Har­ris County and took my lap­top to takes notes. This was when few peo­ple brought lap­tops to the cour­t­house. Some pip­squeak young mis­de­meanor pros­e­cu­tor asked what I was doing. He said I could not take notes word for word. I said I was not. He thought I should stop look­ing at the file until he got a super­vi­sor. I said who said I could not take notes word for word. He said my boss Kelly Siegler. If there was such a silly pol­icy that com­pelled a pros­e­cu­tor that wasn’t even han­dling my case to inter­rupt my note tak­ing, it should have been in writ­ing and said thinks like don’t take down ___ info. The inves­ti­ga­tor came and I explained the mat­ter to him and he walked off. While I did not deal with Kelly directly, she had enough of an impact to cause a pros­e­cu­tor not deal­ing with my case to shove his nose where it didn’t belong. Kelly obvi­ously was not a pro­po­nent of scan­ning files at that time. She was cer­tainly not as open file minded as she tried to por­tray her­self in her cam­paign. So if we know the real Bob Ben­nett do we know the real Kelly Siegler? Did Pat Lykos quit smok­ing? She used to smoke on the bench after smok­ing was banned in the San Jac­into building.

  8. Robert Cardenas says:

    Great post.. Hope­fully the Chron­i­cle reporter(s) assigned to the story read it and use it.
    Please email it to them if you can. I think Har­ris county res­i­dents would love your research and the way you con­nected the dots. Very well done.

  9. […] the extent of their rela­tion­ship. I also asked him, if that was the extent of their rela­tion­ship, why did his wife per­form the duty of swear­ing Ms. Pol­lard in as a regent of Sam Hous­ton State Univer…? He told me he really didn’t know but in any case it had noth­ing to do with a grand […]

  10. Sue Hudson says:

    Always look­ing for a con­spir­acy where there is none. How about, (drum roll please) karma com­ing back to bite them in the arse. My mother told me that deeds done in the dark of night always come out in the bright day­light. It appears that the sun is now ris­ing over the DA’s office.

  11. […] Remem­ber, even the “head” of the move­ment to oust DA Lykos, chal­lenger Mike Ander­son, told me that he “com­pletely under­stood my con­cerns about the appear­ance of impro­pri­ety with this Grand Jury”. So it is very easy to under­stand why ADA Palmer and her team would make the charge that the entire inves­ti­ga­tion is designed to embar­rass the DA’s office in an effort to oust DA Lykos. I don’t agree with that and think it is far more com­pli­cated but I can’t argue that they do not have a com­pelling case. They laid out their case in two court doc­u­ments this week, a Motion to Recuse Susan Brown and a Response to Motion to Com­pel. You will need to read them to under­stand their case but it is an expan­sion of what Mark Ben­nett out­lined in part here: Live by the Hatchet, Die by the Hatchet. […]

  12. […] at the Har­ris County DA’s office, observers were able to draw impor­tant con­nec­tions between the grand jury fore­man and the polit­i­cal oppo­nent of the incum­bent. That cast light on poten­tial motives of those dri­ving that highly politicized […]

Leave a non-anonymous Reply