Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

That’s Just How We Roll

Until recently, Texas Penal Code § 31.03 pro­vided that theft is “a state jail felony if,” among other things, “the value of the prop­erty stolen is less than $20,000 and the prop­erty stolen is insu­lated or non­in­su­lated tub­ing, rods, water gate stems, wire, or cable that con­sists of at least 50 per­cent: (i) alu­minum; (ii) bronze; or (iii) cop­per.” But the new statute deletes the text from “insu­lated” to “50 per­cent,” so that the new ver­sion now makes theft a felony when “the value of the prop­erty stolen is less than $20,000 and the prop­erty stolen is … (i) alu­minum; (ii) bronze; (iii) cop­per; or (iv) brass.”

(Volokh)

This is not the first time that the Texas Leg­is­la­ture has incom­pe­tently writ­ten a penal statute. It won’t be the last time. Texas leg­is­la­tors are, after all, mostly prod­ucts of Texas’s pub­lic edu­ca­tion sys­tem, and most of them were highly stu­pid to begin with. When the Texas Leg­is­la­ture man­ages to get it right, it’s the excep­tion rather than the rule. Some­times it even passes statutes intend­ing to do one thing but doing the exact oppo­site.

Yes, it really is a felony to steal an alu­minum can in Texas. And yes, some Texas pros­e­cu­tor will file felony charges against some­one for steal­ing an alu­minum can (keep an eye on John Bradley). The defen­dant might plead guilty to a mis­de­meanor to avoid the felony (the gen­eral point of over­charg­ing), but if he goes to trial, he’d bet­ter hope for a jury that knows about nul­li­fi­ca­tion, because if he’s con­victed, he’s screwed. No court of appeals in Texas is going to dis­re­gard the plain lan­guage of the statute, no mat­ter how ludi­crous. Ludi­crous is pretty much par for the course.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

7 Responses to “That’s Just How We Roll”

  1. Jeff Gamso says:

    Of course, unless the scoundrel steals Reynolds Wrap (and even then), the state should have to dig out a met­al­lur­gist to tes­tify to the actual chem­i­cal makeup of the stuff. I cer­tainly wouldn’t stipulate.

  2. Mark Draughn says:

    I think what ulti­mately hor­ri­fies me is that no one in the leg­is­la­ture is going to find out about this and go “Oh my God! Some­one could get hurt!! We’ve got to fix this right away!” It’s only peo­ple going to jail. No rea­son to hurry.

  3. Michael Stuart says:

    All the bet­ter to feed the for-profit prison slave sys­tem with the newly-homeless caught col­lect­ing felony quan­ti­ties of pop cans for recycling.

    Strangely, this actu­ally gives me hope. It’s solid evi­dence of the bound­less incom­pe­tence in government.

    Or would you rather have a com­pe­tent tyranny?

    Always look on the bright side. And put down that can, quickly!

  4. Mimi Smith says:

    How do you steal an alu­minum can? If it’s empty, it’s trash. If it is closed, it is the prod­uct inside. But I love the notion, and I will leave the machi­na­tions up to John Bradley.

    Thanks for the alert to this comical-if-it-weren’t-for-the-John-Bradley’s piece of leg­is­la­tion. I plan to file crim­i­nal com­plaints against police and pros­e­cu­tors who steal alu­minum cans.

    There are courses in law schools on leg­isla­tive draft­ing. Are our reps hir­ing only the chil­dren of their con­trib­u­tors to do writ­ing and research?

  5. Alex Scharff says:

    One local news sta­tion grabbed this story and told the gen­eral pub­lic that it’s now a felony to steal 1 penny–since it’s made out of cop­per (or brass, I for­get). They talked to a pros­e­cu­tor who “assured” the reporter there was no way he would abuse the law. And you’re right about the appel­late courts not over­turn­ing the plain word­ing of the statute–I learned that when they let the state add the defendant’s own blood to the drug as an “adul­ter­ant or dilutant”—-Keep tellin’ it like it is, brother

    • Mark Bennett says:

      Adul­ter­ants and dilu­tants law is ludi­crous. Dump the meth in the toi­let to get rid of it when the cops come, and they seize the toi­let water and count its entire mass as meth.

      • Michael Stuart says:

        Yep. And the 400 MICRO-gram dose of LSD on a 500 MILLI-gram stamp? You guessed it. 500mg of acid.

        The puri­tanism of it all sick­ens me the most. Despite the fact that most liver trans­plants are the end result of aceta­minophen tox­i­c­ity, the pious thugs con­tinue to insist on dilut­ing all man­ner of per­fectly nice opi­ates with the wretched stuff. On the odi­ous the­ory that it serves’em right if they destroy their liv­ers by being drug addicts.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply