Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Another Bad Screening Arrest

I get it: if you dis­re­spect the TSA author­i­tah, you will get arrested.

Like this:

But now, a Col­orado woman is accused of putting her hands on a TSA agent at Sky Har­bor Inter­na­tional Air­port in Phoenix.

Court records show 61-year-old Yukari Mihamae grabbed the left breast of the female agent Thurs­day at the Ter­mi­nal 4 checkpoint.

Police say she squeezed and twisted the agent’s breast with both hands.

Offi­cers say Mihamae admit­ted to the crime.

There’s no word why she touched the agent.

When I read a story like this, I like to read the applic­a­ble law. It’s a lit­tle ser­vice I pro­vide for my read­ers to try to dis­tin­guish myself from every other idiot com­ment­ing on the story. Here’s the applic­a­ble law:

A per­son com­mits sex­ual abuse by inten­tion­ally or know­ingly engag­ing in sex­ual con­tact with any per­son who is fif­teen or more years of age with­out con­sent of that per­son or with any per­son who is under fif­teen years of age if the sex­ual con­tact involves only the female breast.

Squeez­ing and twist­ing someone’s breast with both hands” is sex­ual con­tact, even if there is no intent to arouse or grat­ify anyone’s sex­ual desire. But the lack of sex­ual intent is a defense (h/t Matt Brown, my go-to guy in Arizona):

It is a defense to a pros­e­cu­tion pur­suant to sec­tion 13–1404 or 13–1410 that the defen­dant was not moti­vated by a sex­ual interest.

I don’t know what moti­vated Ms. Mihamae, but “there’s no word why she touched the agent,” sug­gest­ing that when she “admit­ted to the crime” she didn’t admit that she was moti­vated by a sex­ual interest.

If Ms. Mihamae was protest­ing rather than propo­si­tion­ing, she may have com­mit­ted a mis­de­meanor assault—a class 1 mis­de­meanor (up to six months in jail), at the worst, if she caused phys­i­cal injury.

If every­one you arrest hasn’t com­mit­ted the crime of which you’ve accused them, it will—I promise you—come back and bite you.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

14 Responses to “Another Bad Screening Arrest”

  1. If you could post a pic­ture of the breasts in ques­tion, your gen­tle read­ers could assist you in second-guessing the moti­va­tion behind the action by the defendant.

  2. Mike Paar says:

    If every­one you arrest hasn’t com­mit­ted the crime of which you’ve accused them, it will—I promise you—come back and bite you.

    Every­one? Maybe if every­one had the means to afford a Mark Ben­nett. Unfor­tu­nately, most do not, and pros­e­cu­tors use these trumped-up charges as lever­age to force a guilty plea to the proper charge. I fail to see the “bite” in these cases…

    I’ve been see­ing a lot of pros­e­cu­tors lately who accept a felony charge only to down­grade it to a mis­de­meanor after an attor­ney is retained, which costs the accused two or three-times the amount than if the proper mis­de­meanor charge had been filed in the first place. Just an obser­va­tion from a non-lawyer who reads a lot.

  3. Mark Draughn says:

    Well, if the agent was doing a typ­i­cal TSA pat­down, per­haps Ms Mihamae mis­took it for an invi­ta­tion. After all, when some­one touches you inti­mately, it’s not nor­mally a crime to respond in kind.

  4. Lisa Simeone says:

    Fyi, all, two con­tacts if you want to show your sup­port for Yukari Mihamae (and there are already at least two Face­book pages sup­port­ing her for those who are on FB):

    Bill Mont­gomery is the County Pros­e­cu­tor in Mari­copa county. Mari­copa County Attor­ney Office 301 West Jef­fer­son Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003
    Phone 602−506−3411.
    You can send an e-mail through this link: http://www.maricopacountyattor?ney.org/FAQ/contact.html
    Here’s what I sub­mit­ted to Bill Mont­gomery via that link (hop­ing the for­mat­ting goes through here):

    Dear Mr. Montgomery:

    As a jour­nal­ist who has been cov­er­ing TSA abuse for the past 18 months, and a life­long advo­cate of non-violence, I am urg­ing you to drop all charges against Yukari Mihamae (Miyamae).

    My under­stand­ing is that Ms. Mihamae had already endured repeated gropes by TSA agents in the past, and finally snapped. While I don’t advo­cate phys­i­cal con­fronta­tion, I can under­stand how this hap­pened and I sym­pa­thize with Mihamae.

    If this comes to trial, I don’t believe there’s a jury in the coun­try that would vote to convict.

    This is a crit­i­cal civil lib­er­ties issue. TSA abuse is ram­pant. Inci­dents aren’t few and far between, and they aren’t minor. I’ve com­piled just the ones that have received a mod­icum of pub­lic­ity, in a doc­u­ment that stands at over 40 pages. You can see it at this link:

    http://www.travelunderground.org/index.php?threads/master-lists-of-tsa-abuses-crimes.317/

    It seems to me those inci­dents are what law enforce­ment should be inves­ti­gat­ing, not Yukari Mihamae.

    Respect­fully,
    Lisa Sime­one
    Bal­ti­more, MD
    —————————————

    Re here defense, accord­ing to FB and Mar­tin­dale Hubbell, her attorney’s name is Judd Golden, who prac­tices con­sti­tu­tional law, as well as gen­eral law. Says he’ll be issu­ing a state­ment “soon.” He’s also chair of the Boul­der County ACLU.

    By the way do you know how far you have to push a cul­tur­ally con­formist per­son like a Japan­ese woman to fight back like this?? The Japan­ese are raised to bow to author­ity; it’s a cul­tural imper­a­tive. Think about that for a minute. This woman must’ve been abused beyond endurance. And she has more guts than most Amer­i­cans, who love to brag about “free­dom” and “democ­racy” and “inde­pen­dence.” I think the pros­e­cu­tor is going to have to make an exam­ple of her; oth­er­wise, this will start hap­pen­ing all over the coun­try, and they know it. It will start hap­pen­ing any­way, of course, as peo­ple with guts make a stand, but exam­ple still Mark will be able to give us insight on this.

  5. Mr. B., do you think this (tit-for-tit) case will make it to a Jury trial or end up in the “Plea Bar­gain Files” ?

    Also does any­one have a bet to place on the time­line in which the female clien­tele only attor­ney Glo­ria A. will hold a press con­fer­ence next to Ms. Mihamae?

    And could this case lead to jail over­crowd­ing due to all of the wait­resses get­ting ass-slapped and hugs last­ing for more than 10 sec­onds in pub­lic? This just might bring the coun­try out of it loom­ing deficits due to increased fines and jobs? Thanks.

    Note: if it’d been a male that snapped & started squeez­ing boobs, he’d been beat down and the smell of the taser(s) would linger in the con­course for weeks.

    • Lisa Simeone says:

      “Note: if it’d been a male that snapped & started squeez­ing boobs, he’d been beat down and the smell of the taser(s) would linger in the con­course for weeks.”

      Have to agree. The police are mighty fond of their Tasers these days. But I pre­dict this kind of thing will start hap­pen­ing more and more. Not nec­es­sar­ily return-groping, but slapping-away-of-hands, push­ing, shov­ing, etc. And yes, peo­ple will then be fur­ther abused, as has already hap­pened (Claire Hirschkind; Nadine Kay Hays; the woman at Rea­gan National who was given a con­cus­sion and whose name I for­get; count­less others).

      I can imag­ine a father watch­ing his wife or chil­dren get­ting groped and los­ing it.

      I still say there’s not a jury in the coun­try who would con­vict said man or Yukari Miya­mae (by the way, her lawyer Judd Golden weighed in at one of the FB pages set up to sup­port her and said it’s spelled with a “y” not an “h”).

      Would love to hear Mark’s views on this.

      • Mark Bennett says:

        Unfor­tu­nately, since a Class 1 Mis­de­meanor has a max­i­mum pun­ish­ment of six months in jail, Ms. Miya­mae would not be con­sti­tu­tion­ally enti­tled to a jury trial.

        Sure, a lawyer could plead her guilty to sex abuse, but unless she admit­ted sex­ual intent on tape or on paper I don’t envi­sion that happening.

        Unless Ms. Miya­mae is deter­mined to stand on prin­ci­ple (I hope she is), I’ll bet the case gets pled down to a class 3 mis­de­meanor assault.

  6. Alexandra Kienker says:

    I believe in the video of the arraign­ment, the jusge threw out the sex­ual intent.

  7. Lisa Simeone says:

    Video: Woman accused of grop­ing TSA agent won’t be charged with sex­ual abuse.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlTeH6m8oqw&feature=player_embedded

    • Michael Stuart says:

      Twenty bucks on the way to Yukari now, thanks for the link Lisa!

      I *sin­cerely* hope this starts a trend. At the very least, it will put a twinkly glim­mer of fear in the porcine eyes of the mis­fits who staff checkpoints.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply