Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

They’d Have to Be Crazy

UTMB’s Cor­rec­tional Man­aged Care pro­gram has an agree­ment with Lone Star Col­lege involv­ing its Law Enforce­ment Phle­botomy Pro­gram. The par­tic­i­pat­ing Hous­ton police offi­cers at the units were there as part of the Lone Star Col­lege course they were tak­ing. Hav­ing blood drawn is part of the stan­dard intake process at TDCJ and men­tally ill offend­ers were given the option of hav­ing a police offi­cer or a staff phle­botomist per­form the pro­ce­dure. All of the men­tally ill offend­ers involved chose to allow the police offi­cers to do the procedure.”

That’s the Uni­ver­sity of Texas Med­ical Branch’s state­ment (via Stephen Dean, Chan­nel 2 News) ratio­nal­iz­ing the use of mentally-ill prison inmates as guinea pigs for police offi­cers learn­ing to draw blood from peo­ple sus­pected of DWI.

Well, it’s almost UTMB’s state­ment ratio­nal­iz­ing the prac­tice; the med­ical school didn’t in fact acknowl­edge that the inmates who “chose” to allow the cops (rather than pro­fes­sional phle­botomists) to draw their blood were all psy­chi­atric patients.

Now we don’t expect police offi­cers nec­es­sar­ily to have a func­tion­ing eth­i­cal compass—the Supreme Court has endorsed police lies, and where the truth is optional there’s no ground on which ethics can stand.

But we expect doc­tors (pre­sum­ably there are doc­tors involved with mak­ing pol­icy at UTMB) to behave eth­i­cally. I’m no med­ical ethi­cist, but this one doesn’t pass even the general-ethics smell test.

Most TDCJ inmates have men­tal health prob­lems, so the bar for assign­ment to a psy­chi­atric unit is not set low; the peo­ple on whom the HPD cops were exper­i­ment­ing were an espe­cially men­tally ill sub­set of a men­tally ill pop­u­la­tion. Fur­ther many of them would, by the time they arrived at prison from some county jail, have been off their psych meds for long enough to be in crisis.

Even if any inmate in an inher­ently coer­cive prison sys­tem could vol­un­tar­ily con­sent to ama­teur med­ical treat­ment, there’s no way all of these human beings were com­pe­tent to con­sult to being prac­tice dum­mies for the cops.

Every TDCJ inmate—even those who aren’t sick enough to be sent to Jester IV—has blood drawn as part of the intake process. So why didn’t UTMB ask men­tally healthy inmates to con­sent to hav­ing these lay­men stick nee­dles in them? For that mat­ter, why not ask free-world patients at UTMB-Galveston to allow the police to exper­i­ment on them?

I think we all know the answer to that.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

8 Responses to “They’d Have to Be Crazy”

  1. Steve Foster says:

    The police should sim­ply learn to draw blood by prac­tic­ing on each other.

  2. David says:

    If they want to stick peo­ple with nee­dles, they should prac­tice on each other. I was in the mil­i­tary for sev­eral years where i was cer­ti­fied as a “com­bat life­saver,” which is a sort of immediate-response first-aid provider. Part of the train­ing was learn­ing how to apply an intra­venous saline drip. It was all hands-on train­ing… on each other, and with mixed results. I com­pleted my graded intra­venous drip on my train­ing part­ner with no prob­lems. When it was his turn, he hit an artery and sprayed type-O pos­i­tive all over the train­ing room and caused a giant deep-tissue hematoma that went from my wrist to the back of my shoul­der blades. My point is that peo­ple just should not sub­ject other peo­ple to a pro­ce­dure that which they wouldn’t will­ingly endure them­selves. It doesn’t really sur­prise me that police offi­cers are will­ing to sub­ject peo­ple to a pro­ce­dure that they are unwill­ing to sub­ject them­selves to. They don’t have enough con­fi­dence in their col­leagues abil­ity to draw a blood sam­ple with­out blow­ing out a vein or caus­ing an infec­tion, but they are just fine sub­ject­ing cit­i­zens to that same risk. Just like how offi­cers always down­play the impact of taser weapons (“I was tased in train­ing, it isn’t that bad”) when their per­sonal expe­ri­ence with a taser is in a safe train­ing envi­ron­ment, on wrestling mats, after a phys­i­cal exam, and with spot­ters so that they don’t bump their lit­tle heads.

    • Mark Bennett says:

      They did prac­tice on them­selves first.

      • David says:

        guess I should have clicked through and read before i jumped to that con­clu­sion. It was mis­di­rected out­rage any­ways. The real out­rage of the whole pro­gram isn’t that they are prac­tic­ing on oth­ers, but the vul­ner­a­ble pop­u­la­tion they have selected to use as prac­tice dum­mies. You pretty much cov­ered that in your orig­i­nal post.

  3. Lee Stonum says:

    sick.

  4. Ric Moore says:

    How can some­one men­tally ill give “gen­uine con­sent”? I thought all pris­oner exper­i­ments were deemed ille­gal on those grounds?

  5. […] They’d Have to Be Crazy […]

  6. […] The Uni­ver­sity of Texas is allow­ing police to con­duct exper­i­ments on men­tally ill pris­on­ers.  Some doc­tors should lose their licenses. […]

Leave a non-anonymous Reply