<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tried to Comment on Texas Lawyer Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/03/tried-to-comment-on-texas-lawyer-blog.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/03/tried-to-comment-on-texas-lawyer-blog.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Fox</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/03/tried-to-comment-on-texas-lawyer-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-13482</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/03/tried-to-comment-on-texas-lawyer-blog.html#comment-13482</guid>
		<description>It also smacks of idiocy. Most websites (at least those who have consulted an attorney - LOL) have this requirement amply laid out in their TOU (Terms of Use) or at least in a footnote for the poster and a requirements check (via submission program) on the submission.

What it does demonstrate is the old adage of &quot;just because you can doesn&#039;t mean you should remains true.&quot; Lawyers while very bright (for the most part) ought defer to us folks whose business is all things web-like - or at least pay for a second opinion LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also smacks of idiocy. Most websites (at least those who have consulted an attorney &#8211; LOL) have this requirement amply laid out in their TOU (Terms of Use) or at least in a footnote for the poster and a requirements check (via submission program) on the submission.</p>
<p>What it does demonstrate is the old adage of &#8220;just because you can doesn&#8217;t mean you should remains true.&#8221; Lawyers while very bright (for the most part) ought defer to us folks whose business is all things web-like &#8211; or at least pay for a second opinion LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

