Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Subpoenaing Out-Of-State Witnesses

Some­how I seem to have become the go-to guy for out-of-state lawyers try­ing to get Har­ris County wit­nesses sub­poe­naed to trial out-of-state. This is sort of a see-one-do-one-teach-one pro­ce­dure, and I’ve done five, so it’s time for me to pass on what I know.

The pro­ce­dure is con­tained in the Uni­form Act to Secure Atten­dance of Wit­nesses from With­out State. Accord­ing to Cal­i­for­nia lawyer Robert Scofield, the Act has been adopted by every state but North Dakota, and by the Dis­trict of Colum­bia and the Vir­gin Islands. North Dakota Cen­tury Code 31−03−25 through –31, how­ever (PDF), looks sub­stan­tially the same as the Act (one of North Dakota’s twelve lawyers can per­haps con­firm my impression).

In Texas, the Act is cod­i­fied at Code of Crim­i­nal Pro­ce­dure Arti­cle 24.28.

Sum­mon­ing a wit­ness from, say, Texas to Nebraska is a six-part procedure:

  1. Lawyer in Nebraska gets a Cer­ti­fi­ca­tion from Nebraska judge “that there is a crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion pend­ing in such court, or that a grand jury inves­ti­ga­tion has com­menced or is about to com­mence, that a per­son being within this State is a mate­r­ial wit­ness in such pros­e­cu­tion, or grand jury inves­ti­ga­tion, and that his pres­ence will be required for a spec­i­fied num­ber of days.”
  2. Lawyer in Nebraska sends Cer­ti­fi­ca­tion to lawyer in Texas.
  3. Lawyer in Texas gets Texas court to issue an Order of Appear­ance at hear­ing. (Here’s a sam­ple motion ask­ing the Texas court to do so.)
  4. Lawyer in Texas gets wit­ness served with Order of Appear­ance.
  5. At hear­ing, Texas judge deter­mines whether the wit­ness is mate­r­ial and nec­es­sary (an issue that should be resolved by the Nebraska judge’s Cer­ti­fi­ca­tion), whether it will cause undue hard­ship to the wit­ness to be com­pelled to attend and tes­tify in Nebraska, and whether the laws of Nebraska give the wit­ness pro­tec­tion from arrest and the ser­vice of process. If he is, it won’t, and they do, the judge issues a Sum­mons direct­ing the wit­ness to attend and tes­tify in the court in Nebraska.
  6. The Nebraska lawyer pays for the witness’s travel and lodg­ing expenses.

It’s not com­pli­cated at all. In Har­ris County, the Dis­trict Clerk now drafts the Order of Appear­ance and the Sum­mons. He doesn’t do it quite the way I would, but it seems to work. I’ve included links to PDFs of the doc­u­ments I drew up in case your clerk isn’t as proac­tive as ours.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

6 Responses to “Subpoenaing Out-Of-State Witnesses”

  1. Karl Keys says:

    Mark:

    Seri­ous thanks as this is a con­stant thorn.

  2. Robert Guest says:

    Excel­lent! I can’t tell you how many lawyers oper­ate under the belief that sub­poena power dies at the state line.

  3. Rick Navarrete says:

    What if I need to sub­poena busi­ness records?

    • Mark Bennett says:

      Rick, I’ve found that com­pa­nies com­ply with faxed sub­poe­nas for records with­out requir­ing me to jump through the hoops of get­ting for­mal ser­vice. If one ignored my sub­poena, I would sub­poena the cus­to­dian of records to come to court, and get him served under the Uni­form Act.

  4. Marc Hedman says:

    Do you know any­thing about a waiver of the hear­ing if a wit­ness in ND will stip­u­late to the cri­ter­ian nec­es­sary under NDCC 31−03−26?

    • Mark Bennett says:

      Marc, I’d be inclined to require the wit­ness to appear before the ND judge and be served with the order. I don’t know that it’s enforce­able otherwise.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply