<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call this &#8220;Notice&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/01/call-this-notice.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/01/call-this-notice.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media Tyro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five Lawyers Trading on the Death of an Innocent</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/01/call-this-notice.html/comment-page-1#comment-12926</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Tyro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five Lawyers Trading on the Death of an Innocent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/01/call-this-notice.html#comment-12926</guid>
		<description>[...] explain how it is okay to use a dead nine-year-old child to advertise legal services. Like Sassower, Chase, and Kahn (who are also invited to explain), Strand, Beck, Petersen, Hark, and Hilles are paying FindLaw to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explain how it is okay to use a dead nine-year-old child to advertise legal services. Like Sassower, Chase, and Kahn (who are also invited to explain), Strand, Beck, Petersen, Hark, and Hilles are paying FindLaw to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Walcutt</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/01/call-this-notice.html/comment-page-1#comment-12760</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Walcutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/01/call-this-notice.html#comment-12760</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see you take a tilt at FindLaw.  I&#039;ve found that they were very successful at selling a lot of overpriced services to lawyers in the late 90&#039;s/early 00&#039;s.  For example, $650/month for hosting of a cookie-cutter website and listing in their directory (which by my calculations, is probably good for one or two clients a year - maybe).  These lawyers are ignorant about and intimidated by the internet and having someone with &quot;law&quot; in their name, puts them at ease, especially since they are under the umbrella of West/Thompson.  Many of those lawyers are not active on the web and only have a presence because they know that they should have some sort of presence out there.  Most of these folks would absolutely agree with the &quot;outsourcing your marketing = outsourcing your reputation&quot; mantra, if only they were aware of what was going on (or had some framework for understanding a copy cat, piggybacking, fakeass &quot;blog&quot;.  Unfortunately, they are not going to get pulled into this until their marketers do something particular egregious, like the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see you take a tilt at FindLaw.  I&#8217;ve found that they were very successful at selling a lot of overpriced services to lawyers in the late 90&#8242;s/early 00&#8242;s.  For example, $650/month for hosting of a cookie-cutter website and listing in their directory (which by my calculations, is probably good for one or two clients a year &#8211; maybe).  These lawyers are ignorant about and intimidated by the internet and having someone with &#8220;law&#8221; in their name, puts them at ease, especially since they are under the umbrella of West/Thompson.  Many of those lawyers are not active on the web and only have a presence because they know that they should have some sort of presence out there.  Most of these folks would absolutely agree with the &#8220;outsourcing your marketing = outsourcing your reputation&#8221; mantra, if only they were aware of what was going on (or had some framework for understanding a copy cat, piggybacking, fakeass &#8220;blog&#8221;.  Unfortunately, they are not going to get pulled into this until their marketers do something particular egregious, like the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Tarlow</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/01/call-this-notice.html/comment-page-1#comment-12757</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Tarlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/01/call-this-notice.html#comment-12757</guid>
		<description>Nu, Markele, you want I should give you a mazel tov on the bissel of Yiddish you used to describe the chazerai they&#039;re trying to pass off as blogs?  These gonifs and their spiel are enough to drive you meshuga.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nu, Markele, you want I should give you a mazel tov on the bissel of Yiddish you used to describe the chazerai they&#8217;re trying to pass off as blogs?  These gonifs and their spiel are enough to drive you meshuga.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

