<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Racehorse in Conflict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wyborny</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html/comment-page-1#comment-10826</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wyborny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html#comment-10826</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression the partnership had just been formed; and Race had not yet transitioned to the new letterhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression the partnership had just been formed; and Race had not yet transitioned to the new letterhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Foster</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html/comment-page-1#comment-10814</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html#comment-10814</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I understand the non-disclosure point raised by Mr. Wyborny, but, to me, if Mr. Haynes was using different firm letterhead in this case while his firm was representing the co-defendant Mr. Duc, then Mr. Huynh deserved better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I understand the non-disclosure point raised by Mr. Wyborny, but, to me, if Mr. Haynes was using different firm letterhead in this case while his firm was representing the co-defendant Mr. Duc, then Mr. Huynh deserved better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wyborny</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html/comment-page-1#comment-10810</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wyborny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/10/racehorse-in-conflict.html#comment-10810</guid>
		<description>Do we know if Boyd III ever disclosed the representation to &quot;Race&quot;? I could see how this could happen if the new partner failed to disclose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we know if Boyd III ever disclosed the representation to &#8220;Race&#8221;? I could see how this could happen if the new partner failed to disclose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

