Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

The Further Adventures of “Lawyer” Andy Nolen

Fol­low­ing on from this post

“Jerry k.” left 31 reviews for Hous­ton lawyers on July 23, 2009: 30 one-star reviews and one five-star review.

Guess who got five stars.

Yep, James A. “Andy” Nolen.

Among the lawyers panned by “jerry k.”: Don Becker (again, twice on this day), Todd Lef­fler, Dan Cor­ri­gan, Doug Durham, Dane and Leslie John­son, Den­nis Slate, Larry Dou­glas, Dan Ger­son, Jeff Purvis, Mek­isha Mur­ray, David Bre­ston, Paul B. Kennedy, Joe Sal­hab, Cyn­thia Hen­ley, and John Floyd (again). Every one of them is at least ten times the lawyer Andy Nolen is.

We knew already that Andy Nolen was a lousy uneth­i­cal lawyer; the true tale is told by the most recent real review on Andy Nolen’s Yahoo Local page:

Did not show to court on first day. this is not good.

That’s the Andy Nolen that the bar asso­ci­a­tion knows so well!

Andy Nolen was suc­cess­fully grieved by two clients in 2006 (thanks to Avvo.com for mak­ing that tid­bit so easy to find). He got a two-year pro­bated sus­pen­sion from the state bar because:

In one mat­ter, Andy Nolen was retained to rep­re­sent his client on crim­i­nal charges. Andy Nolen failed to attend sched­uled hear­ings. Andy Nolen’s client attempted to con­tact him on numer­ous occa­sions but was unsuc­cess­ful.

In a sec­ond mat­ter, Andy Nolen was retained to rep­re­sent his client on crim­i­nal charges but failed to rea­son­ably com­mu­ni­cate with his client. Andy Nolen also failed to timely file a writ­ten response to the alle­ga­tions or assert any grounds for his fail­ure to do so.

Andy Nolen got pun­ished by the State Bar for doing the very things that his two com­menters com­plain of other lawyers doing? What an amaz­ing coin­ci­dence! I am shocked. Shocked!

On July 10, 2008, “mad­mom” wrote (h/t Brian Tan­nebaum):

Would not rec­om­mend this attor­ney. Retained him for crim­i­nal case, paid him and after sev­eral resets, he stood us up in court. Never showed. Called, emailed, etc sev­eral times to find out why and where he was, and he has yet to return any­thing, includ­ing my money! I will be report­ing him to the bar assoc and any other so called assoc he claims to be a mem­ber of. Leav­ing us stranded with­out any rep­re­sen­ta­tion should not be tol­er­ated and tak­ing our money is theft.

In other words, the same con­duct for which Andy Nolen had, four months ear­lier, got­ten off of pro­ba­tion for committing.

I hope that “mad­mom” fol­lowed through on her threat to grieve Andy Nolen. If she reads this, I’ll be happy to help her do so. In fact, if any actual client would like my help in fil­ing a griev­ance against Andy Nolen, I’ll be happy to help. It’s highly unlikely that the State Bar will let him off so lightly next time.

(After I wrote the above, I googled Mek­isha Mur­ray to send her a link to Andy Nolen’s fraud­u­lent reviews. See my next post for what I found.)

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

6 Responses to “The Further Adventures of “Lawyer” Andy Nolen”

  1. […] of a decent blog­ger is to link to other blog­gers when he has noth­ing to say.  On that note, do not anger Mark […]

  2. […] The Fur­ther Adven­tures of “Lawyer” Andy Nolen […]

  3. […] The Fur­ther Adven­tures of “Lawyer” Andy Nolen […]

  4. […] The Fur­ther Adven­tures of “Lawyer” Andy Nolen […]

  5. […] The Fur­ther Adven­tures of “Lawyer” Andy Nolen […]

  6. […] The Fur­ther Adven­tures of “Lawyer” Andy Nolen […]

Leave a non-anonymous Reply