Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Jury Selection: Simple Rule 5: MacCarthy’s Bar Rule

Okay, those of you who iden­tify them­selves as “attor­neys” and “Esquires”, and any­one else who likes peo­ple to know that he has a law degree and is there­fore supe­rior: lis­ten up. This one is for you.

The fifth Sim­ple Rule for Bet­ter Jury Selec­tion is bla­tantly stolen from and there­fore named in honor of Chicago fed­eral pub­lic defender Terry Mac­Carthy, who likes to say, “Talk in a court­room like you would talk in a barroom.”

The MacCarthy’s Bar Rule:

Talk in jury selec­tion like you would talk in a barroom.

This rule is in part a mat­ter of word choice: don’t use lawyerly words. If you might have to define a word for the jury, find some sub­sti­tute that you won’t have to define. For exam­ple, this process that we’re study­ing is not “voir dire” but “jury selec­tion”. “Cred­i­bil­ity” becomes “believ­abil­ity”. The “jury charge” becomes “the judge’s writ­ten instruc­tions to you at the end of the case”. And so forth.

It is also in part a mat­ter of tone: don’t con­de­scend. You may think you’re bet­ter than some of those 60 peo­ple, but you’re not. More impor­tantly, if it seems to those 60 peo­ple you’re talk­ing to that you think you’re bet­ter than any of them, they’re going to pun­ish you for it. But don’t grovel, either. Nobody likes a groveler.

We can talk about word choice and tone, but it’s really about sta­tus. Jury duty is America’s great lev­eler. You can play higher sta­tus than your jurors, talk­ing down to them. They might nod, smile, and humor you, but they’ll dis­like you, and when they get out of your con­trol (that is, back in the jury room) they’re going to show you who is in fact boss. To your client’s chagrin.

Or you can fol­low MacCarthy’s Bar Rule, treat­ing the jurors like equals whom you need to like and under­stand you. They won’t bow and scrape, but they will under­stand you more, like you more, and com­mu­ni­cate with you better.

Talk in jury selec­tion like you would talk in a barroom.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

4 Responses to “Jury Selection: Simple Rule 5: MacCarthy’s Bar Rule”

  1. Grey Tesh says:

    I’m a fan of talk­ing in plain Eng­lish to a jury. Com­mu­ni­ca­tion is key. Lawyers who use big words when pick­ing a jury are idiots.

    It makes them more com­fort­able. Peo­ple tend to find for who they like, if they can. Talk­ing like you are in a bar (minus the curse words of course) is where it’s at.

    Grey

  2. Dennis Elias says:

    The key to atten­tion is induc­ing sur­prise and curios­ity. They expect “Lawyer Man!” to lay down a numb­ing bar­rage of legalese. They expect you to be an expen­sive suit, good hair­cut and exud­ing haughty grandios­ity. Be the guy on the stool next to them at Barney’s Sports Bar. Vio­late their expec­ti­a­tions. Sur­prise them and they will pay atten­tion. Speak plainly and they will be curi­ous. Make small self dis­clo­sures and they will begin to trust and do the same. Mostly. Gain a mod­icum of rap­port. You are going to need it.

  3. Mike Trent, Esq says:

    Does that mean I can’t use the word “bifur­cated?” Drat!

    I find it a bit ironic that the pre­vi­ous poster ruined his viable point by using the word “mod­icum” in the sec­ond to last sentence.

    Mike Trent
    Attor­ney at Law

  4. The Big Three– No not Ford,GM and Chrysler…Sincerity-Credibility & Like­ablity are keys to being authen­tic and respected and this quite pos­si­bly is the foun­da­tion for Mark’s rules. Let’s pin this down!

    What does sin­cer­ity look like?
    How do you sound when you are sin­cere?
    How do you behave when you are sin­cere?
    What types of words do you use when you are sin­cere?
    What is the emo­tional qual­ity of sin­cere communication?

    Here are some anchors to help you define sin­cer­ity.
    > Hon­esty in word and actions.
    > One who means what they say is a sin­cere per­son.
    > Con­sis­tency between words, actions and val­ues.
    > Speak­ing truly about one’s feel­ings, thoughts, hopes and dis­ap­point­ments.
    > Using your own lan­guage, style and form to express yourself.

    Cred­i­bil­ity

    What does cred­i­bil­ity look like?
    How do cred­i­ble peo­ple sound?
    How do you behave when you are being cred­i­ble?
    What types of words do you use when you are cred­i­ble?
    What is the emo­tional qual­ity of cred­i­ble communication?

    Here are some anchors to help you define credibility.

    > You are believ­able as a source of infor­ma­tion.
    > Cred­i­bil­ity emerges from and enhances trust­wor­thi­ness.
    > Exper­tise enhances cred­i­bil­ity.
    > Exag­ger­a­tion and jar­gon detracts from trust­wor­thi­ness, exper­tise and cred­i­bil­ity.
    > Cred­i­bil­ity is the qual­ity or power of inspir­ing belief.
    > Cred­i­bil­ity is influ­enced by whether you are per­ceived as being honest.

    Like­abil­ity

    What does like­abil­ity look like?
    How do like­able peo­ple sound?
    How do you behave when you want peo­ple to like you?
    What types of words do you use to be like­able?
    What is the emo­tional qual­ity of likeability?

    Here are some anchors to help you define likeability.

    > Like­able peo­ple are civil to oth­ers.
    > Like­able behav­ior includes being real (sin­cere & cred­i­ble).
    > Empa­thy is essen­tial to like­abil­ity.
    > Like­able peo­ple are friendly.
    > Man­age your appearance-understated, neat, and main­stream.
    > Project mod­esty and no mat­ter how smart you may be build from humil­ity.
    > Dis­play a sense of enti­tle­ment and peo­ple won’t peo­ple wont like you.
    > Per­ceived sim­i­lar­ity increases likeability

    Sin­cer­ity, like­abil­ity and cred­i­bil­ity begin with first impres­sions. This means main­tain­ing an attrac­tive, neu­tral appear­ance, speak­ing appro­pri­ately, and being unfail­ingly hon­est and courteous.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply