Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Jury Selection: Simple Rule 4: The 90/10 Rule

We lawyers love to hear our­selves talk. That can be the death of a jury selec­tion. In a good voir dire, the jurors do most of the talk­ing. Even if I can’t hear what the lawyer and jurors are say­ing, I can tell a good voir dire from a bad one by lis­ten­ing, as long as I can tell who is talk­ing. Lawyer talk­ing most of the time? Bad. Jurors talk­ing most of the time? Good.

So the fourth Sim­ple Rule for Bet­ter Jury Selec­tion is the 90/10 Rule: let the jurors talk 90 per­cent of the time (or more) in voir dire.

Try to find a way to elicit more infor­ma­tion with fewer words (more about that later, espe­cially in Rules 8 and 11). If you have a bril­liant defense, try to find a way to get one of your jurors to come up with it. If a juror or your adver­sary says some­thing that must be refuted, let your jurors refute it (if it’s worth refut­ing, one of them will, given the chance, refute it). Among the many ben­e­fits of talk­ing less, you’ll learn more, the jurors will like you more (or at worst dis­like you less), and the judge will be more reluc­tant to limit your time.

90/10: Get them talk­ing, and keep them talking.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

2 Responses to “Jury Selection: Simple Rule 4: The 90/10 Rule”

  1. Dr. SunWolf says:

    Excel­lent guide­line, Mark!

    Now, we need a rule for “How to Inter­rupt a Juror.”

    Even a juror can floun­der, go on too long, erupt into a mono­logue that leaves other jurors out–yet attor­neys often freeze, afraid to offend by stop­ping the time-eating speech.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply