<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, You Are Not Publius.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9553</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9553</guid>
		<description>Moderating comments is a pain in the ass. I&#039;d rather moderate commenters, eliminating those who are unwilling to identify themselves before they become a problem.

I&#039;m inclined to prefer that commenters be committed enough to create a permanent web footprint of the things they say before commenting here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moderating comments is a pain in the ass. I&#8217;d rather moderate commenters, eliminating those who are unwilling to identify themselves before they become a problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m inclined to prefer that commenters be committed enough to create a permanent web footprint of the things they say before commenting here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lyons</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9552</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9552</guid>
		<description>I had never gotten the impression that this blog suffered much from the anonymous commenting that plagues more mainstream sites. It&#039;s a shame if that has changed. 

Why not just subject all comments to moderation and be done with it? Are the comments pages of this blog searchable on google/yahoo? Is there a way to disable that? That would probably help those of us who don&#039;t want to be difficult but want to avoid creating a permanent web footprint of things we&#039;ve said on sometimes touchy issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had never gotten the impression that this blog suffered much from the anonymous commenting that plagues more mainstream sites. It&#8217;s a shame if that has changed. </p>
<p>Why not just subject all comments to moderation and be done with it? Are the comments pages of this blog searchable on google/yahoo? Is there a way to disable that? That would probably help those of us who don&#8217;t want to be difficult but want to avoid creating a permanent web footprint of things we&#8217;ve said on sometimes touchy issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas R. Griffith (The Griffith Files - 1984 &#38; Beyond)</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9381</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas R. Griffith (The Griffith Files - 1984 &#38; Beyond)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9381</guid>
		<description>Before this post &amp; it&#039;s replies petter out, I thought I would remind you all of just how good of an idea it is to refuse to allow lil school girls to join in any future discussions with adults on this adult blog. 

Take a moment &amp; go to the A Harris County Lawyer blog &amp; or Grits for Breakfast blog.  While both are good blogs, and I follow both, one can&#039;t help but to notice the pissing matches going on between the Anonymous folks that seem to know each others names. If one doesn&#039;t know the Anons. true name they are refered to simply as 05:32 or 10:01.  Then come back to Defending People and finish reading if you wish.

Welcome Back, What did I tell ya?
When they are finished belittling each other or correcting other peoples spelling they simply go down in blog history as 05:32 and or 10:01 to the outsider that is.  There is no way in hell you can honestly have an adult conversation with an Anon. especially if they  ALL LOOK ALIKE. Get it?  Mr. B. is doing us all a favor by finally seperating the boys from the men &amp; girls from the women.  Read his post before replying and you&#039;ll feel better in the morn.  A verifiable email address attached to the so-called nickname is not a frigin Anonymous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before this post &amp; it&#8217;s replies petter out, I thought I would remind you all of just how good of an idea it is to refuse to allow lil school girls to join in any future discussions with adults on this adult blog. </p>
<p>Take a moment &amp; go to the A Harris County Lawyer blog &amp; or Grits for Breakfast blog.  While both are good blogs, and I follow both, one can&#8217;t help but to notice the pissing matches going on between the Anonymous folks that seem to know each others names. If one doesn&#8217;t know the Anons. true name they are refered to simply as 05:32 or 10:01.  Then come back to Defending People and finish reading if you wish.</p>
<p>Welcome Back, What did I tell ya?<br />
When they are finished belittling each other or correcting other peoples spelling they simply go down in blog history as 05:32 and or 10:01 to the outsider that is.  There is no way in hell you can honestly have an adult conversation with an Anon. especially if they  ALL LOOK ALIKE. Get it?  Mr. B. is doing us all a favor by finally seperating the boys from the men &amp; girls from the women.  Read his post before replying and you&#8217;ll feel better in the morn.  A verifiable email address attached to the so-called nickname is not a frigin Anonymous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9373</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9373</guid>
		<description>Slow down there. 

&quot;Exceptions will be considered for nicknames and for established web personalities whose true identities I know, like the lads at PopeHat&quot; does not mean that no other exceptions will be considered.

Clearly, this policy is a work in progress. I&#039;ll take every case on its own merits. People who have established web personalities with their own blogs, they have a sort of accountability because of the time they&#039;ve invested in the credibility of their noms de blog.

By the way, I don&#039;t desire to be understood by everyone. The only way to accomplish that is to write for the slowest kid in the classroom; I know from personal experience that that won&#039;t fly with the other kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slow down there. </p>
<p>&#8220;Exceptions will be considered for nicknames and for established web personalities whose true identities I know, like the lads at PopeHat&#8221; does not mean that no other exceptions will be considered.</p>
<p>Clearly, this policy is a work in progress. I&#8217;ll take every case on its own merits. People who have established web personalities with their own blogs, they have a sort of accountability because of the time they&#8217;ve invested in the credibility of their noms de blog.</p>
<p>By the way, I don&#8217;t desire to be understood by everyone. The only way to accomplish that is to write for the slowest kid in the classroom; I know from personal experience that that won&#8217;t fly with the other kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shg</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9372</link>
		<dc:creator>shg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9372</guid>
		<description>Drugstore cowboys?  I thought they were rhinstone cowboys.  And I thought Jdog was his real name.  Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drugstore cowboys?  I thought they were rhinstone cowboys.  And I thought Jdog was his real name.  Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon McEachern</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9371</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon McEachern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9371</guid>
		<description>Whoa there Mark!
You say that you&#039;re going to make exceptions for nicknames of folks whose true identities you know -- What about your readers who do NOT know who these commenters really are? They are anonymous to us. In fact, it leaves one with the feeling that it&#039;s one of those private-club type of blogs, and that you desire exclusivity rather than being understood by everyone. OH, PUHLEEZ!  It&#039;s as if you are saying &#039;this blog is just for me and my buddies. Stay out.&#039; I know that&#039;s not your intent.

By the way -- I would use &quot;btw,&quot; but I feel the same way about abbreviations as I do anonymous commenters. Newbies might not understand their meanings and I truly want to be inclusive. I think  some want to make the newbies pay their dues -- why should we make it easier for them, when we had to work at it? Isn&#039;t there enough of that in how law associates are treated?

By the way, I too published the complete Declaration of Independence as the July 4th post on my blog, Ethic Soup.com. Very few have read it. It&#039;s probably the least-read post of all. I guess it&#039;s old news and not very interesting to most. I feel certain that few people have actually read the whole document. Sad. As an American, it&#039;s really one of those things you should do before you die.

If you&#039;re interested in the Burr Oak Cemetery mess, check out Ethic Soup and the following two articles:

http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/07/burr-oak-cemetary-mama-where-are-you-theyve-robbed-your-grave.html

http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/07/where-is-emmett-tills-coffin-where-are-the-babyland-graves-.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa there Mark!<br />
You say that you&#8217;re going to make exceptions for nicknames of folks whose true identities you know &#8212; What about your readers who do NOT know who these commenters really are? They are anonymous to us. In fact, it leaves one with the feeling that it&#8217;s one of those private-club type of blogs, and that you desire exclusivity rather than being understood by everyone. OH, PUHLEEZ!  It&#8217;s as if you are saying &#8216;this blog is just for me and my buddies. Stay out.&#8217; I know that&#8217;s not your intent.</p>
<p>By the way &#8212; I would use &#8220;btw,&#8221; but I feel the same way about abbreviations as I do anonymous commenters. Newbies might not understand their meanings and I truly want to be inclusive. I think  some want to make the newbies pay their dues &#8212; why should we make it easier for them, when we had to work at it? Isn&#8217;t there enough of that in how law associates are treated?</p>
<p>By the way, I too published the complete Declaration of Independence as the July 4th post on my blog, Ethic Soup.com. Very few have read it. It&#8217;s probably the least-read post of all. I guess it&#8217;s old news and not very interesting to most. I feel certain that few people have actually read the whole document. Sad. As an American, it&#8217;s really one of those things you should do before you die.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in the Burr Oak Cemetery mess, check out Ethic Soup and the following two articles:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/07/burr-oak-cemetary-mama-where-are-you-theyve-robbed-your-grave.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/07/burr-oak-cemetary-mama-where-are-you-theyve-robbed-your-grave.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/07/where-is-emmett-tills-coffin-where-are-the-babyland-graves-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/07/where-is-emmett-tills-coffin-where-are-the-babyland-graves-.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hull</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9370</link>
		<dc:creator>Hull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9370</guid>
		<description>Mark:  

Do stay the course on this new direction.  It hopefully will take as a default position--and yet still be accommodating to class bloggers, writers, thinkers and responsible non-wimp commenters who deserve anonymity.  One&#039;s real identity is almost always important for accountability and quality of discourse.

The work to create intelligent exceptions is well worth the effort.  The best argument for this is what happens every day at Above The Law.   Go to ATL and see for yourself:  the emergence of a new class of highly educated but nameless haters, innuendo-hurlers, wankers and drugstore cowboys.   

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark:  </p>
<p>Do stay the course on this new direction.  It hopefully will take as a default position&#8211;and yet still be accommodating to class bloggers, writers, thinkers and responsible non-wimp commenters who deserve anonymity.  One&#8217;s real identity is almost always important for accountability and quality of discourse.</p>
<p>The work to create intelligent exceptions is well worth the effort.  The best argument for this is what happens every day at Above The Law.   Go to ATL and see for yourself:  the emergence of a new class of highly educated but nameless haters, innuendo-hurlers, wankers and drugstore cowboys.   </p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soronel Haetir</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9369</link>
		<dc:creator>Soronel Haetir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9369</guid>
		<description>You get few enough comments as it stands, I doubt this is going to matter much one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get few enough comments as it stands, I doubt this is going to matter much one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9367</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9367</guid>
		<description>Exceptions will be considered for nicknames and for established web personalities whose true identities I know, like the lads at PopeHat.

A foolish consistency etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exceptions will be considered for nicknames and for established web personalities whose true identities I know, like the lads at PopeHat.</p>
<p>A foolish consistency etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Neff</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html/comment-page-1#comment-9366</link>
		<dc:creator>John Neff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/07/no-you-are-not-publius.html#comment-9366</guid>
		<description>Jdog and SHG (for example) are not anonymous because those of us that regularly read the blogs where they post know who is positing, I would hope that Mark will figure out a way to take that into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jdog and SHG (for example) are not anonymous because those of us that regularly read the blogs where they post know who is positing, I would hope that Mark will figure out a way to take that into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

