Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Today’s Houston Criminal Law News

This, an appeal aris­ing out of a Hous­ton case is, as far as I can tell, the first time ever that Judge Sharon Keller has reversed a case to a defendant’s benefit.

Bailiff uses taser on man accused of pho­tograph­ing wit­ness.

John­son was watch­ing a trial in state Dis­trict Judge Ruben Guerrero’s court, offi­cials said, then stood up in the gallery and took a pic­ture with his cell phone.

Because a wit­ness whose iden­tity was being pro­tected was tes­ti­fy­ing, a bailiff escorted the man out and tried to con­fis­cate the phone, Har­ris County Sheriff’s Office spokes­woman Susan Card said. The two strug­gled and the bailiff shocked the man with the Taser, Card said.

Alter­nate story:

Dar­rell Jor­dan, a defense attor­ney, said he was an observer in the mur­der trial when the inci­dent occurred. Jor­dan, who is not con­nected to the trial, said the man protested that he didn’t take a pic­ture of the wit­ness. He told to bailiffs and Precinct 1 constable’s deputies that he took a pic­ture of his younger brother, the vic­tim in the case.

Jor­dan said a bailiff escorted the man out of the court­room and told him not to come back. Cussing the bailiff, Jor­dan said, the man tried to go back in and was brought out again.

Con­victed Hous­ton cop killer wins new trial because the trial judge shouldn’t have allowed the State to exclude two Cana­di­ans black peo­ple from the jury.

In the opin­ion in Haynes v. Quar­ter­man (PDF), the Fifth Cir­cuit Court of Appeals noted that the judge, who did not observe the voir dire, had no rea­son to uphold the prosecution’s demeanor-based jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for its peremp­tory chal­lenges of the two black jurors.

Why didn’t the judge observe the voir dire? Because a vis­it­ing judge presided over jury selec­tion (and, not for noth­ing, that judge was clean­ing his pis­tols dur­ing the jury selec­tion).

Haynes, a Hous­ton Fire Depart­ment arson investigator’s son, shot HPD Sgt. Kent Kin­caid for no appar­ent rea­son.

Choice quote:

It’s the view of this court that the life that was taken by you was cer­tainly of greater value than the life that you have lived for the short time you have been on this earth,” Wal­lace said.

See, that’s why I could never be a judge — I’m not act­ing under the impres­sion that I’m God.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

2 Responses to “Today’s Houston Criminal Law News”

  1. Michael says:

    I keep hear­ing and read­ing that the HCDAs are, as a class, very good to excel­lent trial lawyers, and the defense bar has some of the best crim­i­nal minds in the coun­try (er, make that crim­i­nal law minds). So how come the crim­i­nal bench is so infested with asshats?

  2. Michael says:

    (…or can I say that on TV?)

Leave a non-anonymous Reply