<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharon Keller&#8217;s Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Mitchell QC &#62;&#62; Fashion statements and other legal issues of the day in America</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Mitchell QC &#62;&#62; Fashion statements and other legal issues of the day in America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7705</guid>
		<description>[...] choice his &#8220;customary fees&#8220;. This, she girned, meant that she was faced with a &#8220;financially ruinous legal bill&#8221;1. Nice, some will think, to have a constitution that protects lawyers&#8217; right to charge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] choice his &#8220;customary fees&#8220;. This, she girned, meant that she was faced with a &#8220;financially ruinous legal bill&#8221;1. Nice, some will think, to have a constitution that protects lawyers&#8217; right to charge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7688</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7688</guid>
		<description>I bet this will be its own post here soon enough, but Dallas Morning News reports today (3/30) that Judge Killer has omitted almost $2 million worth of property from her statutory disclosure of property holdings.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/state/stories/033009dnprokellerasets.3df3149.html

Maybe Texas Constitutional expert Chip Babcock won&#039;t bring financial ruin upon Killer after all.  But does that matter now?  I think this article is a fork all by itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet this will be its own post here soon enough, but Dallas Morning News reports today (3/30) that Judge Killer has omitted almost $2 million worth of property from her statutory disclosure of property holdings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/state/stories/033009dnprokellerasets.3df3149.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/state/stories/033009dnprokellerasets.3df3149.html</a></p>
<p>Maybe Texas Constitutional expert Chip Babcock won&#8217;t bring financial ruin upon Killer after all.  But does that matter now?  I think this article is a fork all by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7686</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7686</guid>
		<description>Do one of you want to explain why: 

*TDS had not already briefed the LI issue?  One, it was the hot issue at the time. And, two, conference for Baze was set 9/24, therefore, any competent atty knew cert would be granted the following day. And please don&#039;t tell me about computer problems. How many people don&#039;t have 2 or more computers and 2 or more printers?

*TDS didn&#039;t call and ask who was assigned to after hours filing and ask to speak to that judge directly?  I mean come on! They have handled capital cases before, haven&#039;t they? That is what you are supposed to do, isn&#039;t it? 

It&#039;s ridiculous to point the finger at anyone but TDS.  I don&#039;t know why they wanted to go public with this because it is going to come back and bite them in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do one of you want to explain why: </p>
<p>*TDS had not already briefed the LI issue?  One, it was the hot issue at the time. And, two, conference for Baze was set 9/24, therefore, any competent atty knew cert would be granted the following day. And please don&#8217;t tell me about computer problems. How many people don&#8217;t have 2 or more computers and 2 or more printers?</p>
<p>*TDS didn&#8217;t call and ask who was assigned to after hours filing and ask to speak to that judge directly?  I mean come on! They have handled capital cases before, haven&#8217;t they? That is what you are supposed to do, isn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous to point the finger at anyone but TDS.  I don&#8217;t know why they wanted to go public with this because it is going to come back and bite them in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7652</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7652</guid>
		<description>Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Judge Asks State to Pay Her Lawyer - The Lede Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7644</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Judge Asks State to Pay Her Lawyer - The Lede Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7644</guid>
		<description>[...] the blog &#8220;Defending People,&#8221; Mark Bennett, a Houston criminal defense lawyer, ridicules the logic of the filing, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the blog &#8220;Defending People,&#8221; Mark Bennett, a Houston criminal defense lawyer, ridicules the logic of the filing, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7637</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7637</guid>
		<description>That was one of Rick Casey&#039;s suggestions; see his column that I linked to in one of today&#039;s posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was one of Rick Casey&#8217;s suggestions; see his column that I linked to in one of today&#8217;s posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hockema</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7636</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hockema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7636</guid>
		<description>It would be fitting if she were appointed one of the lawyers who slept while their clients were convicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be fitting if she were appointed one of the lawyers who slept while their clients were convicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7620</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7620</guid>
		<description>You must be the only person other than me who has read every article here. Thank you for reading, even though you are a cretin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be the only person other than me who has read every article here. Thank you for reading, even though you are a cretin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Baxter</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7619</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Baxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7619</guid>
		<description>Declaring that were we a newspaper free town we would be a news free town exposes the kind of limp thinking that went into this and every article located here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Declaring that were we a newspaper free town we would be a news free town exposes the kind of limp thinking that went into this and every article located here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron in Houston</title>
		<link>http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html/comment-page-1#comment-7614</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron in Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/sharon-kellers-response.html#comment-7614</guid>
		<description>Oh my.  It&#039;s funny.  It&#039;s ironic.  It&#039;s sad.  

The saddest part is that I highly doubt Keller sees the irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my.  It&#8217;s funny.  It&#8217;s ironic.  It&#8217;s sad.  </p>
<p>The saddest part is that I highly doubt Keller sees the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

