Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Sharon Keller’s Been a Bad, Bad Girl

The Dal­las Morn­ing News reports that Texas Court of Crim­i­nal Appeals Pre­sid­ing Judge Sharon Keller, who recently whined about not get­ting Chip Bab­cock appointed to rep­re­sent her in the Com­mis­sion for Judi­cial Conduct’s suit against her, “failed to abide by legal require­ments that she dis­close nearly $2 mil­lion in real estate hold­ings” in a sworn state­ment to the Texas Ethics Com­mis­sion last April.

The sworn state­ment Keller was required to file with the Texas Ethics Com­mis­sion last April reflected income of more than $275,000, includ­ing her annual state salary of $152,500. It also showed that she owned at least 100 shares of air­line stock, a home in Austin and one com­mer­cial prop­erty in Dal­las. County tax records val­ued the prop­er­ties at about $1 million.

Keller’s state­ment did not list her own­er­ship inter­est in seven other res­i­den­tial and com­mer­cial prop­er­ties in Dal­las and Tar­rant coun­ties. Those prop­er­ties are val­ued col­lec­tively by county appraisal dis­tricts at about $1.9 million.

When Texas politi­cians fall, they fall hard. Some­one should have told her that fal­si­fy­ing gov­ern­ment doc­u­ments could be a felony.

Sharon Keller’s lawyer, Chip Bab­cock, had pre­dicted that his antic­i­pated six-figure bill would be ruinous to Judge Keller based “on the resources Keller listed on her lat­est per­sonal finan­cial report to the state”. He “was not aware of the extent of her hold­ings until told about them by The News.”

His new posi­tion, in light of the assets she was hid­ing not only from the Texas Ethics Com­mis­sion but also from him?

Bab­cock then acknowl­edged that Keller might be able to sell enough prop­erty to pay her legal bills. But he said the amount of Keller’s assets should not alter their legal posi­tion that she should be allowed to ben­e­fit from reduced attorney’s fees or be pro­vided his legal ser­vices at state expense.

The argu­ment ought to be the same whether you came to the bench after hav­ing amassed sub­stan­tial assets or you inher­ited it, or you don’t have any assets,” he said.

Yep. Whether you’re a mil­lion­aire trust-fund baby or not, if you get elected judge, you’re enti­tled.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

3 Responses to “Sharon Keller’s Been a Bad, Bad Girl”

  1. Richard Paul Timm says:

    Mr. Ben­nett, Texas has become a fear-dependent State for elected offi­cials. And many elected offi­cials have cap­i­tal­ized on it; Sharon Keller being an excel­lent exam­ple. Many of the peo­ple with whom I grew up here sim­ply think in two dimensions…and the results of that are what they’re going to reap. But, unfor­tu­nately, that near­sight­ed­ness will be dis­trib­uted to all of us unless some­one lit­er­ally fights against it.

    There are plenty of exam­ples of the warn­ings of total­i­tar­ian think­ing, just off the top of my head are:

    When I despair, I remem­ber that all through his­tory the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and mur­der­ers, and for a time they can seem invin­ci­ble, but in the end they always fall. Think of it–always.

    The weak can never for­give. For­give­ness is the attribute of the strong.
    Mahatma Gandhi

    Democ­racy becomes a gov­ern­ment of bul­lies tem­pered by edi­tors.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson

    I could tell you the first time I con­tested a traf­fic ticket at 20 years old, and I real­ized how naive I was. I wasn’t guilty. But, there was the city attor­ney, the attest­ing offi­cer, and the pre­sid­ing jus­tice of the peace against me. I was so naive that I pre­sumed that since I’d sworn an oath to tell the truth, which I did, that that would be enough. I still half-chuckle to myself now when I think about my inno­cence. Then, why, when found guilty of going 35 mph in a 30 mph zone, wasn’t I also charged with per­jury? I swore an oath to tell the truth. Which I did. The offi­cer was sim­ply mis­taken. No big­gie. It can hap­pen to any­one. But, really, I wasn’t speed­ing. I was telling the truth. And I real­ized the entire force of the author­i­ties that I’d pre­vi­ously trusted were incred­i­bly obtuse and bor­der­ing on insane. I real­ized after­ward, they were most afraid of being tricked. Nev­er­the­less, after that, I never trusted a police offi­cer, pros­e­cu­tor, or jus­tice of the peace again. I knew some­thing they didn’t know: I told the truth, I was hon­est, and I wasn’t afraid to tell them so. It’s a very trite exam­ple, but it lit­er­ally made me grow up. You need proof. And unless you’ve got a video­tape recorder run­ning con­tin­u­ously or other time-recorded device to ride shot­gun, then you’re out of luck.

    Now, what would I do if the police were actu­ally act­ing unlaw­fully; plant­ing dis­cred­it­ing evi­dence, col­lud­ing, or just blindly hat­ing the gen­eral pub­lic? God help you. It feels like liv­ing in an US-and-THEM soci­ety, where those attached to the Court are the US and the rest of the pub­lic is the THEM. The police become paid rats, jack­als and stool-pigeons; and the gen­eral pub­lic become the prey. It is very dif­fer­ent than the police fight­ing against bur­glars, gen­uine rapists, and the odd mur­derer. The police must real­ize they’ve sim­ply become a street-level wing of some type of rev­enue ser­vice. Any­thing else should be treated in an admin­is­tra­tive way. Crim­i­nal courts are for crim­i­nals: felons. The Bad Guys. When did it become that every­one was a poten­tial crim­i­nal? Sharon Keller knows…

  2. […] a pub­lic ser­vant and that makes her spe­cial. I say good luck with that argu­ment. Thanks to Mark Ben­nett for the […]

  3. Richard: I would rather have the elected offi­cials live in fear, than we mere civil­ians. Sharon Keller is now expe­ri­enc­ing a small, small amount of fear: far less than any defen­dant has ever expe­ri­enced it, but it is so far out of her world-view that she can­not under­stand WHY she should be held PERSONALLY respon­si­ble for her judi­cial actions, even if they WERE highly uneth­i­cal and led to a pre­ma­ture execution.

    I believe that elected, and appointed, and hired, pub­lic offi­cials ALL need to be held to the high­est stan­dards, daily. This means hold­ing them account­able when they err. They are our ser­vants, not our mas­ters, regard­less of their opin­ions on the mat­ter. Mis­con­duct on their parts is far, far more grave than mis­con­duct on the part of civil­ians — and they should start pay­ing the price when they fall below the stan­dards the rest of us mere mor­tals have to meet.

    I’m amazed that the Com­mis­sion on Judi­cial Con­duct is hold­ing Ms. Keller’s feet to the fire. I believe that, whether she remains on the bench or not, she will in the long run be a changed judge — for the bet­ter. She is hav­ing the sort of expe­ri­ence more judges need — and deserve.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply