Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Pat Lykos’s Diversity Record

Mur­ray New­man posts about Pat Lykos’s ter­rific suc­cess utter and com­plete fail­ure in mak­ing the Har­ris County Dis­trict Attorney’s Office more diverse. Not only are there not more non-white lawyers there than there were before Lykos came along, but there will also be fewer non-white lawyers in the Office a week from Friday.

My only com­plaint about Murray’s post is that he throws away fod­der for a sev­eral other blog posts.

  • The A.D.A.‘s are being told that the bud­get has already been expended.
  • The morale within the Office con­tin­ues to plummet.
  • Lykos is spend­ing a large amount of time in the base­ment park­ing garage smok­ing like a chim­ney while forc­ing her staff to come with her to talk business.
  • The Office is hem­or­rhag­ing money hav­ing to pay for spe­cial pros­e­cu­tors to han­dle every case where Jim Leit­ner or Clint Green­wood acted as defense attorneys.
  • The inves­ti­ga­tor that Lykos brought in to act as her per­sonal chauf­feur for her county vehi­cle has appar­ently already wrecked said county ride.

C’mon, now, Mur­ray. The smok­ing alone is worth 500 words.

If you’re one of the ADAs send­ing this stuff to Mur­ray, feed it to me too.

Or instead. I won’t just throw it away.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

13 Responses to “Pat Lykos’s Diversity Record”

  1. I’ll be more inter­ested in his posts when he starts sound­ing like an angry cit­i­zen or an angry defense lawyer, not an angry twice-fired ADA who wishes he was still employed by Siegler and can’t let go of his sour grapes. I think that’s the rea­son he throws away the real issues, as opposed to explor­ing them fully.

    /not a piss­ing match

  2. AHCL says:

    Oh, I’ll be com­ing back to the other things I listed at a later date, but I was just feel­ing that the diver­sity issue was timely at the moment. The smok­ing in the garage is some­thing I’m still look­ing into — give me a cou­ple of days.

    As for Rage’s com­ment, oh, hell, nevermind.

    • Wait. Of all the issues you and Mark listed, the one you want to come back to is the smok­ing one? Not diver­sity, inbreed­ing, lop­sided pay scales, mis­ues of per­son­nel, or the other rel­e­vant issues?

      Is that really what Har­ris County cit­i­zens should be the most upset about?

      I’d ask this on your blog, but you seem to have stopped approv­ing my posts. So, maybe you can add some sub­stance here?

      • Mark Bennett says:

        Rage, maybe he picked smok­ing because I picked it?

        The smok­ing alone is worth 500 words.”

        • Then I ques­tion your choice as well. But he is not lim­ited to yours, and is free to hit big­ger sub­jects, so I still ques­tion why he would have cho­sen to come back to that one.

          Any­way, like I said I have a ton of issues with Har­ris County, but the bud­get run­ning dry two weeks before the end of the fis­cal year (assum­ing March 1 is the date) ain’t one of them. Nei­ther is smok­ing, espe­cially when a damn-near sep­tu­a­ge­nar­ian is doing it because she’s set in her ways like lots of old folks, so they’re bound to do it in a way that sounds odd to peo­ple our age. And nei­ther really is diver­sity. I’m all for it, but I’m more for merit hir­ing than diver­sity hiring.

          Like I said, there are lots of things to talk about, espe­cially for some­one decry­ing the wast­ing of posts, but smok­ing is the least of them.

          • Mark Bennett says:

            I was tempted to explain the nuance of “The smok­ing alone is worth 500 words”, but expla­na­tion kills nuance, and I sus­pect that most read­ers got it.

            Hey, I’ve got an idea: instead of try­ing to pick fights with Mur­ray and “Arthur Seaton” here, you could do it in com­ments on their blogs. Bet­ter yet, you could write a blog of your own — the bar­ri­ers to entry are sur­pris­ingly low!

          • I got your point as well. Mine is that while that may at least be worth 500 words, there are oth­ers worth more but he spends more time on the triv­ial than the substantive.

            I’m quite hon­estly sur­prised that you’re soft ped­al­ing his gripes. Tells me you’re more con­cerned with get­ting along with pros­e­cu­tors than you are point­ing out the injus­tices in the office. The real injus­tices, not just when some­one has to fol­low Lykos for a smoke break.

          • Mark Bennett says:

            Even in the face of some seri­ous com­pe­ti­tion, Rage, that may be the dumb­est blog com­ment of the day.

            Wel­come to the small but dis­tin­guished com­pany of peo­ple who have, by their demon­strated dim­ness or inabil­ity to play well with oth­ers, earned mod­er­ated sta­tus here.

      • Michael says:

        I’m always amused at smok­ing DAs because they’re addicts, though their par­tic­u­lar drug is nico­tine, but they make crim­i­nals out of addicts whose sub­stances of choice are less polit­i­cally pop­u­lar. Nico­tine addicts are much more waste­ful pre­cisely because they can legally leave their desks for cig­a­rette breaks. So, I have no prob­lem with AHCL pick­ing smok­ing as the topic du jour.

  3. ambimb says:

    This is a small part of what you’re talk­ing about here, but it’s a pet peeve of mine: What is it that makes defense attor­neys become pros­e­cu­tors? Is it that they never wanted to be on the defense side in the first place and only did that to get the expe­ri­ence that got them hired as pros­e­cu­tors? Is it just the money? I know I shouldn’t care — tax­pay­ers end up pay­ing for it when those trai­tors have to con­flict out of cases and what­not, and those of us on the defense side can just say good rid­dance to bad rub­bish b/c if these peo­ple don’t have defense in their hearts they might as well do some­thing else. Still…

    • Mark Bennett says:

      Jim and Roger were both pros­e­cu­tors before they were respected defense lawyers before they were pros­e­cu­tors again. (And Roger was a judge some­where in there as well.)

  4. S.O. says:

    In this era of pub­lic out­ings of offi­cials such as Lykos, How is it that she is get­ting away with it? I mean really, a spe­cial inves­ti­ga­tor to drive her around?

    Perry caught heat for not not order­ing DPS to pub­lish the amounts they were spend­ing on his secu­rity. Why is it this woman believes it alright or jus­ti­fied to be able to run her depart­ment in this fashion?

  5. Chuck says:

    Rage — why don’t you start your own blog and go there.…

    Mark — please, please, please file some open records requests for the pay scales of the new hires (includ­ing your favorite lat­eral hire). Also, if we could some­how find out how much money Lykos blew on new county cars for everyone.

    If she wanted to save money — do like HPD and don’t allow take home cars. The thought of some of the hire-ups hav­ing to pay for their own gas just shocks the conscious.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply