Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Because Sometimes We Buy Our Own Bullshit

In the com­ments to Murphy’s Law of Inves­ti­ga­tion we had a lit­tle dis­cus­sion of what a lawyer should do when his client main­tains his fac­tual inno­cence, and he dis­cov­ers that there is evi­dence that, if ana­lyzed, could either con­firm that fac­tual inno­cence or con­clu­sively dis­prove it.

Renais­sance man Joel “JDog” Rosen­berg wrote of a hypo­thet­i­cal rape kit with untested DNA:

If you open Schroedinger’s rape kit, you’re pretty sure that either a: he walks, or b: it’s over, ’cause he’s going to be con­victed. There is no reverse Brady oblig­a­tion; you don’t have to point out to the pros­e­cu­tor that there’s this untested rape kit, that you think he or she over­looked. Since you decide that this is a deci­sion you have to run past your client, he says, hey, I didn’t do it, but I trust you to do the right thing for me.

Isn’t there at least an argu­ment that you leave it alone, at least until the jury comes back?

Now, in a post on his Waco crim­i­nal law blog, Waco criminal-defense lawyer Wal­ter Reaves describes his han­dling of such a sit­u­a­tion (text­book han­dling, in my view), and the unfor­tu­nate out­come for his client — “He con­tin­ued to insist he was inno­cent, and we sent the evi­dence off to be tested. It came back today, and sure enough, there is now no doubt what­so­ever that he’s guilty” — and asks, “How can some­one con­vince him­self that he is not guilty?”

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

4 Responses to “Because Sometimes We Buy Our Own Bullshit”

  1. Ron in Houston says:

    I take great joy in all my delusions.

  2. Gideon says:

    The com­ment at the Waco blog made me chuckle.

  3. Mark Bennett says:

    Clay Con­rad is a smart dude, and funny too. He should start blog­ging again.

  4. Katie says:

    Ha, and I sup­pose you haven’t heard of the foren­sic lab case that sent inno­cent peo­ple to prison and hun­dreds of her cases had to be re-investigated?
    Integrity is afforded to those in cer­tain posi­tions. Every­one has a ‘price’ today and integrity can be bought. There is also the ‘qual­ity’ of foren­sic care in per­for­mance. What makes any­one think that a lab­o­ra­tory find­ing is Gospel in
    today’s society’s lack of morals and val­ues and work ethic? Work in a Lab for
    an eye open­ing experience!

Leave a non-anonymous Reply