Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

The Nature of the Job

The job is anti­de­mo­c­ra­tic, to begin with. Our Con­sti­tu­tional mis­sion is to con­front and resist author­ity, which, in Amer­ica (where we like to elect our author­ity fig­ures) means flout­ing the more-or-less demo­c­ra­t­i­cally expressed will of the major­ity. Suc­cess­fully defend­ing peo­ple usu­ally means telling those whom the major­ity has cho­sen to enforce the laws made by its rep­re­sen­ta­tives that either they or the laws are wrong. In other words, the mob is wrong.

Which explains why lots of peo­ple don’t much care for us: they are under the impres­sion that they live in a democ­racy, where what the major­ity says is always right. This mis­con­cep­tion leads them to (among other things) resent judi­cial review, and feel threat­ened by those who resist their will. To explain how it is that an intel­li­gent per­son could stand up in court day after day and tell the mob that it is wrong, they tell them­selves (and, as anony­mous blog com­menters, any­one else who will lis­ten) that criminal-defense lawyers are sleazy, dis­hon­est, unethical.

And so is born the myth of the lying criminal-defense lawyer. Tell some­one that you are a criminal-defense lawyer and, with­out know­ing any­thing else about you, chances are that she’ll assume that you are per­fid­i­ous. The myth rein­forces itself as new criminal-defense lawyers join the bar; some buy into pub­lic view that lying is part of the job and con­firm the mob’s suspicions.

The truth, though, is that lying isn’t part of the criminal-defense lawyer’s job. A criminal-defense lawyer doesn’t have to lie, cheat, or steal to succeed.

In fact, a criminal-defense lawyer can’t lie, cheat or steal and suc­ceed. A defense based on lies is almost always doomed to fail. A lawyer who lies has failed to find the truth that saves his client, and has lost the case already. Yagyu Munenori, in The Book of Fam­ily Tra­di­tions on the Art of War, a 17th-century Japan­ese sword­fight­ing text (avail­able in The Book of Five Rings trans­lated by Thomas Cleary), writes:

What­ever the false mind does is wrong. If this wrong mind emerges, you will lose at mar­tial arts; you will miss the mark with bow and gun, and will not even be able to ride a horse. If you per­formed in a drama or a dance in this state, it would also be unpleas­ant to watch and lis­ten. Mis­takes will also show up in what you say. Every­thing will be off. If you accord with the orig­i­nal mind, how­ever, every­thing you do will be good.

.…

The false mind is sick­ness of mind; get­ting rid of this false mind is called get­ting rid of sick­ness. Rid of this sick­ness, the mind is healthy. This sound mind is called the orig­i­nal mind. If you accord with the orig­i­nal mind, you will excel in mar­tial arts. This prin­ci­ple is rel­e­vant to every­thing, with­out exception.

(Hold on to that idea. We’ll return to it another day in the con­text of what we do, rather than just how we do it.)

Clients some­times think that they want a lawyer who will act uneth­i­cally for them, but they don’t: first, because a defense based on lies is almost always doomed to fail; and sec­ond, because clients need lawyers they can trust. Uneth­i­cal lawyers are … uneth­i­cal. A lawyer who behaves dis­hon­estly “for his clients” can rea­son­ably be expected to behave dis­hon­estly toward his clients. [Edit: Or, as Windy Pun­dit Mark Draughn writes, “you have no right to be sur­prised when you dis­cover he’s rip­ping you off and screw­ing your wife.”]

Let a were­wolf into your house, and you’re likely to get bitten.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

9 Responses to “The Nature of the Job”

  1. remy says:

    Mark,

    I really enjoy when you break it down like this…

    rem

  2. sctexas says:

    the myth of the lying crim­i­nal defense lawyer”

    It’s a myth that ALL crim­i­nal defense lawyers are liars, but it cer­tainly isn’t a myth that some of them are, is it?

  3. Mark Bennett says:

    No, SC, of course not:

    The myth rein­forces itself as new crim­i­nal defense lawyers join the bar; some buy into pub­lic view that lying is part of the job and con­firm the mob’s suspicions.”

    Duh.

  4. Windypundit says:

    Thanks for the link. I don’t really have enough expe­ri­ence with lawyers to be say­ing things like that, but I fig­ured I could gen­er­al­ize from my expe­ri­ences with sales peo­ple. There’s some over­lap in the job skills, and the sharks never stop being sharks.

  5. sctexas says:

    some buy into pub­lic view that lying is part of the job and con­firm the mob’s suspicions.”

    That’s not the fault of or the result of the mob–it’s the fault of the lawyer.

  6. sctexas says:

    Duh indeed.

  7. Mark Bennett says:

    To go far­ther, we might attribute some blame to the expe­ri­enced crim­i­nal defense bar for not teach­ing all those the new crim­i­nal defense lawyers (of the fresh-out-of-law-school as well as the fresh-out-of-the-DA’s-office vari­ety) that, con­trary to what they see on TV, lying isn’t part of the job.

  8. It has been my very pleas­ant expe­ri­ence in Har­ris County that 99% of the Defense Bar hear are very hon­est. The few who aren’t are well known and, I believe, equally shunned by both the Pros­e­cu­tion and the Defense Bar.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply