Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Do You Love the Law?

Are you pas­sion­ate about the law? Do you think the law is a beau­ti­ful thing? Do you adore it?

Not I.

The law is a street fight. It’s trench war­fare. There’s noth­ing beau­ti­ful about it. It’s inel­e­gant, messy and dan­ger­ous. Some­times the right side loses. Often every­one loses.

Our jus­tice system’s the worst pos­si­ble — except for (to crib shame­lessly from Churchill) all the oth­ers that have been tried.

Jus­tice? Jus­tice is a whore. Some peo­ple think they can look at the offense report in a crim­i­nal case, inves­ti­gate, inter­view wit­nesses, and know what the accused deserves. These peo­ple are delu­sional about their own abil­i­ties and importance.

Other peo­ple write arti­cles for the Texas Bar Jour­nal about their fields of law; if the arti­cles not about trial law or crim­i­nal law, or if they’re writ­ten by peo­ple who call them­selves “lit­i­ga­tors” I gen­er­ally skip them. I don’t care who the next State Bar of Texas pres­i­dent will be, or who’s run­ning the Texas Young Lawyers’ Asso­ci­a­tion. Most months I read the Texas Bar Jour­nal only to see who’s been dis­barred and who’s died, and to make sure that I’m still on nei­ther list.

Any area of the law becomes much more inter­est­ing to me when it inter­sects the crim­i­nal law — I once became an expert in a nar­row area of real estate law when I had a client who was accused of steal­ing houses from wid­ows. I’m not entirely incu­ri­ous about other areas of law, but they rank pretty high on my list of Things I Don’t Want to Learn More About Unless I Have To. Right up there with .…

Hmm. They seem to be at the top of that par­tic­u­lar list.

It’s hard for me to think of any­thing less rel­e­vant to a gen­eral crim­i­nal defense trial prac­tice than pro­bate law. Except maybe oil-and-gas law. Quan­tum physics is more rel­e­vant. Herodotus is more rel­e­vant. The com­me­dia dell’arte is more rel­e­vant. Dog train­ing is more rel­e­vant to a gen­eral crim­i­nal defense prac­tice than most other areas of law are.

I am pas­sion­ate about defend­ing peo­ple, and feel for­tu­nate to be a criminal-defense lawyer, but I’m not proud to be a lawyer qua lawyer. If I couldn’t be a criminal-defense lawyer, I think I’d hang up my spurs and be a mechanic.

I gen­er­ally don’t even like lawyers. Most of them are stul­ti­fied and depressed. Here’s a clue: if your busi­ness card describes you as an “attor­ney” you’re prob­a­bly tak­ing this law thing way too seri­ously. If your sta­tionery car­ries the abbre­vi­a­tion, “esq.” you’re way past “tak­ing it too seri­ously.” The lawyer jokes all have some basis in fact; most of the bad things peo­ple think about lawyers are too often true.

No, I don’t love the law.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

15 Responses to “Do You Love the Law?”

  1. Jigmeister says:

    You need a vacation.

  2. Leviathan says:

    Luck­ily, my friend, love is not a prerequisite.

    When I read AHCL’s blog, I just shake my head that he/she has not a clue how lit­tle the DA’s race means to most of us who work in the CJC. Do we care? Well, I know we’re mildly curi­ous, but car­ing may be stretch­ing the point.

    For many of us, our every­day work is like a game or puz­zle that has its own pecu­liar set of rules and we show up each day to see what new twists await. You try to see that some form of jus­tice occurs in your cor­ner of things, but at the end of the day we all return to our lives.

    If you’ve carved a life beyond the law, more power to you.

  3. Ron in Houston says:

    Some­where along the line, I shrugged my shoul­ders and said, “eh, what the hell, there are worse ways of mak­ing a living.”

    No, I don’t love it. How­ever there are times where you feel that you helped jus­tice pre­vail. There are also times where the sys­tem goes crazy and you’re left shak­ing your head and say­ing, “WTF?”

  4. Other Steve says:

    I don’t have busi­ness cards. I once worked in a (non-legal) posi­tion where I would have been jus­ti­fied in hav­ing them, but decided against it so as to remind myself that the job wasn’t about me feel­ing important.

    I take it you have busi­ness cards and sta­tion­ary, though — might I ask how they read?

  5. PJ says:

    What I want to know is: How big of a truck did your client need to haul those houses off?

  6. AHCL says:

    Marky Mark,
    I’m in com­plete agree­ment with you for once. I have often said that I’ve never found any sort of “majesty” in the law, and I’ve often thought that lawyers who think they are spe­cial just for the mere fact that they are lawyers, are actu­ally just pompous morons. They way I look at it, speak­ing “law” is often very often not so dif­fer­ent from being able to speak a for­eign lan­guage.
    My ques­tion to you, my friend, how­ever, is what brought this rant on? I’m a big fan of rants, and Den­nis Miller is one of my comedic idols. I’m just curi­ous as to your motivation.

    Leviathan,
    Sadly, I actu­ally under­stand EXACTLY how unim­por­tant the DA’s race is to a lot of peo­ple. That’s why I run my blog. Hope­fully I will make it inter­est­ing to SOMEBODY. I mean, if some lonely guy in Ponca City, Okla­homa can devote a blog to his cat, why can’t I write one about the DA’s race? :-) And by the way, Leviathan, I wish you posted more often. Even though we don’t always agree, I do miss your insight.

    PJ,
    I rarely (if ever) agree with you, but that was pretty funny.

  7. Mark Bennett says:

    Jig­meis­ter, this is me after a good vaca­tion. Not to worry, though, I’ll be going to Costa Rica this sum­mer to visit my brother. I may even return.

    Leviathan, crim­i­nal defense intrudes into the rest of my life in a way that I can’t imag­ine any other area of the law doing.

    Ron, I’m not sure which I enjoy more: feel­ing that I might’ve helped jus­tice pre­vail, or feel­ing that I’ve stuck it to the government.

    Other Steve, my casual (paper) cards say “Ben­nett & Ben­nett / Just Lawyers Help­ing Peo­ple” and my for­mal (etched stain­less) cards say “Ben­nett & Ben­nett / Crim­i­nal Defense Lawyers / Abo­ga­dos Defen­sores”. That’s on the front, along with our tele­phone num­ber. On the back the stain­less ones have five other ways to con­tact us (address, toll-free num­ber, fax, email, Mex­ico num­ber) and the paper ones have seven (address, fax, toll-free, two web­sites, my email, Jen’s email) around the cor­ners and “Because peo­ple need lawyers they can trust.” in the mid­dle. Sta­tionery is paper (the stain­less sta­tionery was too hard to fold), and has the same con­tent as the casual busi­ness cards.

    PJ, it’s funny you should ask that. There’s appar­ently a con­sumer fraud trial going on in the cour­t­house now in which the accused is accused of actu­ally steal­ing houses, which is what had me think­ing of my client, who was forg­ing deeds to him­self and then get­ting cash loans against the deeds. Allegedly.

    AHCL, we got two copies of the worth­less Texas Bar Jour­nal today, filled with all sorts of pompous asshattery.

    So you’re com­par­ing Kelly Siegler to a cat in Ponca City? I refuse to take that straight line where it deserves to go.

  8. I don’t under­stand your com­ment about lawyer jokes.

    As every­one knows, there are only three lawyer jokes.

    All the rest are true stories.

    I think I was lucky in that I started law school at age 36, after a career in enter­tain­ment engi­neer­ing. Those kids who go from high school to col­lege to law school, then think they are com­pe­tent to judge every­one else’s life when they’ve never had one of their own, gen­er­ally annoy me. Their judg­ment is poor; they have no per­spec­tive; they can­not com­mu­ni­cate with adults. No won­der so many go on to work in the DA’s office (where knee-jerk reac­tions pass for con­sid­ered judg­ment), while most of the older stu­dents (if they go into crim law) go to the defense side.

    Most good busi­ness schools won’t admit some­one to get an MBA unless they’ve worked for a few years; why law schools admit chil­dren with no real-world expe­ri­ence at all is beyond me. (I think it is because they need the tuition money.) Noth­ing is more valu­able to a lawyer than real-world expe­ri­ence — the sort that is almost impos­si­ble to get while hid­ing behind a bar card.

  9. SC Barrera says:

    I com­pletely agree with you. When I went to law school, it was for the sole pur­pose of becom­ing a crim­i­nal defense attor­ney. While I was in school, I started get­ting offers for jobs at civil firms. I thought “Well, the pay is good and I’ll still be in a court room. After all, lawyers are lawyers, right?” Wrong! The work was bor­ing, the sub­ject mat­ter was bor­ing and the other lawyers were bor­ing. Since I’ve been out on my own prac­tic­ing crim­i­nal defense, I now remem­ber why I spent three years of my life in law school.

  10. Mark Bennett says:

    Clay,

    I’ve writ­ten before about the detri­men­tal effects of pros­e­cu­tors’ lack of real-world expe­ri­ence. It’s funny you should say “per­spec­tive.” Very recently a mis­de­meanor chief got all snitty with me when I pointed out said chief’s lack of per­spec­tive, which will result in a case being tried that doesn’t need to be.

    SC, your path through the law to crim­i­nal defense resem­bles mine.

  11. Greybear says:

    Love the law? Not hardly. It is at best a flawed sys­tem for deter­min­ing truth and con­se­quences. More often, it’s a cha­rade played out to accom­plish a pre-ordained result.

    While my card does use the word “attor­ney”, my pri­vate descrip­tion of what I do is “Hostage Negotiator”

  12. Jigmeister says:

    You guys are stereo­typ­ing again! This looks like assault/insult the “hostage taker” week.

    I went into pros­e­cu­tion after the army, col­lege, marriage/kids, law school and a year of try­ing to col­lect fees from clients.

    Yes, I like the law (hated law school). Loved the court­room. Hated the pre­lim­i­nary rounds. Enjoyed most peo­ple in the crim­i­nal jus­tice com­mu­nity, but hated some of the fools includ­ing the mass pro­duc­tion TV guide types.

    Even once played golf with a defen­dant and his attor­ney dur­ing a con­tin­u­ance. Don’t tell Johnny.

  13. Mark Bennett says:

    Jig­meis­ter,

    You are the excep­tion. As you know, I’ve writ­ten some­where about those with some real-world expe­ri­ence being bet­ter pros­e­cu­tors (all else being equal) than those without.

  14. […] Ben­nett tells us that the law is not a beautiful […]

  15. S.C. Ruffey says:

    Inter­est­ingly, I am cur­rently work­ing on a case that involves pro­bate law (a client is the sub­ject of an adult guardian­ship action by the alleged vic­tim). Sooner or later almost all other areas of the law cross over into crim­i­nal law.

    I was kind of a UCC nerd in law school — I even vol­un­tar­ily took secured trans­ac­tions and com­mer­cial paper. I have had UCC prin­ci­ples turn up sev­eral times in defense cases — such as in the dubi­ous charge of “endan­ger­ing a secu­rity inter­est.” If you know your UCC, you may find that the secu­rity inter­est was never prop­erly set up in the first place.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply