Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Always Ready, Seldom Prepared

The title of this post is, accord­ing to Terry Mac­Carthy (buy the cross-examination CDs!), the criminal-defense lawyer’s credo. I had always thought of it as descrip­tive — the way we are — rather than pre­scrip­tive — the way we should be. We should be pre­pared, shouldn’t we?

Yes and no. There are things we can pre­pare for, and things we can’t. Before try­ing a case, the criminal-defense lawyer (pros­e­cu­tors, you can skip this part; it doesn’t apply to you; go on doing things the way you always have; these are not the droids you’re look­ing for) must be inti­mately famil­iar with the facts and with the law. She should know what the poten­tial evi­den­tiary issues are, both for her and for the gov­ern­ment, and should know what the best argu­ments are on both sides.

She should know her wit­nesses’ sto­ries well enough to help them tell those sto­ries with­out a list of writ­ten ques­tions — with no notes, or min­i­mal notes. The criminal-defense lawyer should know the story she wants to tell on cross-examination well enough that a list of top­ics or key points will keep her on track.

The friendly wit­ness can­not be trusted to stick to the script on direct exam­i­na­tion. Nei­ther can the hos­tile wit­ness on cross-examination. The more spe­cific your roadmap for an exam­i­na­tion, the more likely it is that the wit­ness will leave the road and throw you. Also, the more detailed your notes for an exam­i­na­tion, the less likely it is that you are lis­ten­ing to what’s going on in the court­room. (Please see Why Mind­ful­ness Mat­ters in Trial.)

What’s true in cross-examination is also true in voir dire. The more you try to make the jury selec­tion process fol­low your script (please see Good Voir Dire / Bad Voir Dire, unless you’re a pros­e­cu­tor, in which case you want to go home and rethink your life), the less likely you are to get mean­ing­ful infor­ma­tion or build rap­port with your jurors, and the more likely you are to be frustrated.

In other words, the more pre­pared you are the more likely you are to fail. Be ready, but not pre­pared. In other words, be mindful.

Jury mas­ter Anne Reed, in her Ready for Any­thing post, says, “You need to be ready for what you’re not ready for.” With that lit­tle koan, she’s talk­ing about sur­prises dur­ing jury selection:

The juror who tells you she has sev­en­teen cats, the juror who tells you his child was killed, the juror who isn’t a man after all — you can’t botch these moments.

You also can’t pos­si­bly pre­pare for them. Anne’s point is that you need to be ready for those things that you can’t pos­si­bly pre­pare for. If you pre­pare for the cat lady, the griev­ing par­ent, and the trans­gen­der juror, you’ll be fac­ing a pro­fes­sional sword-swallower, a MADD board mem­ber, or a par­doned ex-felon instead. The vari­ety of human expe­ri­ence is truly unfathomable.

Your com­pas­sion, your aware­ness, your intel­li­gence, and your char­ac­ter will be judged on how you han­dle the next thirty seconds.

You’re not just doing it for the juror who’s revealed the unset­tling story; the way you relate to one juror is the way you relate to all of them. They may not all like each other or agree with each other, but by the time voir dire starts they have formed a group, and you’re not (yet) a part of it.

I’ve seen lawyers shut down entire jury pan­els for­ever by being dis­mis­sive of jurors who say things that they — the lawyers — don’t want to hear.

You need to be at the very least, as the trans­gen­der juror hopes, dis­creet. Warm, engaged, and unfazed would be better.

Dis­creet, warm, engaged and unfazed are a tall order. They can’t be scripted, you can’t pre­tend, and you can’t pre­pare. Be ever ready, but sel­dom prepared.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

5 Responses to “Always Ready, Seldom Prepared”

  1. Anne Reed says:

    Mark, beau­ti­ful. I wish I’d expressed it half this well.

  2. Clint Davidson says:

    Bril­liant! Thanks for tak­ing time to write that great piece.

  3. S.C. Ruffey says:

    Out­stand­ing post

  4. […] “Always ready, sel­dom pre­pared“, Mark Bennett. […]

  5. […] I’ve writ­ten about voir dire scripts before. You’re not going to get very much infor­ma­tion if you walk the jury through your list of ques­tions. If you have a list of ques­tions, you’re not ready for the unset­tling answers. […]

Leave a non-anonymous Reply