You’re welcome to come back when you’ve changed your screen name to something a little more family-friendly. After all, we do it all for the comments, which let us know that other people are reading our stuff!

I read Brian’s post. I believe I got his point, and frankly think he’s largely correct. But I also see how the post could be easily misconstrued and leave people to conclude that he’s on the bad side, not the good. It could have written much clearer.

And by the way, while a scathing commentary, there was nothing about it the required a sense of humor.

So Brian should feel free to clarify any misunderstandings, recognize that clarity was lost on his end, and address it like a human being. But to come here and attack Mark just marks him as a jerk. Would you like to write about my “self-inflated ego” too, Brian? Apparently, only you get a free pass.

So I didn’t get it. So most people didn’t. Wah wah wah. It’s our fault? Talk about ego! You’re whining about us being “attorney’s” with “no sense of humor”? Sheeeeeiiiiiiiitttt.

Humor is communication. You don’t blame the recipient when he doesn’t get the joke. I’ve been funny once or twice; I’ve even made prosecutors laugh. When my humor falls flat, though, it’s my fault, not my audience’s. So whose ego’s getting in the way? I’ll give you a hint: look at the spoiled little child complaining that only the servants are laughing at his show! Grow up, little boy. Sometimes other people don’t think you’re as funny as you think you are.

You don’t know me, Brian. I know you (only from your writings, granted) as a self-important silver-platter wanker playing lawyer. So why you gotta come ‘cross the tracks to poop in this hardworking poor boy’s yard?

And why, for God’s sake, twice?