Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

… Gone!

Chuck Rosen­thal has resigned, effec­tive 3 p.m. today.

In his let­ter of res­ig­na­tion he writes:

Today, I wrote Gov­er­nor Perry and ten­dered my res­ig­na­tion as Har­ris County Dis­trict Attorney.

My deci­sion to retire from office was pre­cip­i­tated by a num­ber of things.

The fed­eral court’s release of my pri­vate emails around Christ­mas of last year brought a lot to bear on my wife and chil­dren. I have been try­ing to restore my fam­ily as a unit, but the con­stant media pres­sure has made that restora­tion more dif­fi­cult. I am hope­ful that, in my retire­ment, the media will accord my fam­ily the pri­vacy we need to heal.

Although I have enjoyed excel­lent med­ical and phar­ma­co­log­i­cal treat­ment, I have come to learn that the par­tic­u­lar com­bi­na­tion of drugs pre­scribed for me in the past has caused some impair­ment in my judgment.

How does the “impaired judg­ment” story affect Chuck’s poten­tial per­jury / obstruc­tion of jus­tice / tam­per­ing with evi­dence charges? I don’t think “the drugs made me do it” is a legal defense to any of these charges, but I don’t see any­one who believes the story being gung-ho to pros­e­cute Chuck for obstruc­tive con­duct that was a result of his impairment.

Dr. Sam Siegler has been described as Chuck’s per­sonal physi­cian; from the emails released back in Jan­u­ary it appears that Dr. Siegler’s office was Chuck’s go-to source for pre­scrip­tion meds.

Who pre­scribed the drugs that impaired Chuck’s judg­ment? Dr. Sam Siegler?

Who is Dr. Siegler mar­ried to? Kelly Siegler.

Whose posi­tion is Kelly now run­ning for? Chuck’s.

Cozy, no?

Did Chuck’s impair­ment escape the notice of those who worked with him at the DA’s Office? If you real­ized that he was impaired, why didn’t you speak up? If you real­ized it and didn’t com­ment, or didn’t real­ize it, what does that say about your judgment?

The DA’s judg­ment is every­thing. The job of DA is about noth­ing but judg­ment. For the past eight years Chuck Rosen­thal has been the guy with his fin­ger on the metaphor­i­cal but­ton, which in his case is a plunger on a syringe full of pan­curo­nium bro­mide and potas­sium chlo­ride. Chuck has made deci­sions that have cost peo­ple their free­dom and their lives. Do those peo­ple get do-overs now that Chuck claims his judg­ment was impaired?

The res­ig­na­tion let­ter continues:

The Texas Attor­ney General’s office has informed my attor­ney that they will not pro­ceed with a removal action if I resign. With­out com­ment­ing on the mer­its of any case the Attor­ney Gen­eral may have pur­sued, to have yet another con­tro­versy sur­round this office is intol­er­a­ble to me.

Of course the AG wouldn’t pro­ceed with a removal action if Chuck resigned. Does Chuck’s inclu­sion of this para­graph mean that the AG had informed Chuck’s attor­ney that he would pro­ceed with a removal action if Chuck did not resign?

Chuck closes his let­ter with praise for the ADAs:

I am extremely proud of the work that the ladies and gen­tle­men of this office do for the cit­i­zens of Har­ris County. They have too many cases, are under com­pen­sated, and are often unfairly crit­i­cized for the hard deci­sions they make in ful­fill­ing their man­date to see that jus­tice is done.

The res­i­dents of Har­ris County need to appre­ci­ate the great work these folks do. As the say­ing goes, “If I were asked to lead a charge on Hell, I’d want these peo­ple in my ranks.”

I expect those ADAs’ response will be some­thing along the lines of “gee, thanks.” Until six weeks ago, they would all prob­a­bly have fol­lowed Chuck on his charge into Hell; most of them now feel like, in the past five weeks, they have.

The big polit­i­cal ques­tion now: who gets appointed DA until next January?

If the gov­er­nor is a pure polit­i­cal hack he’ll anoint one of the Repub­li­can nom­i­nees — HCRP favorite Lykos or, if Chuck cut a deal before resign­ing, Siegler. Oth­er­wise he appoints some­one who is not already run­ning for the office or leave it in the hands of First Assis­tant Bert Gra­ham for the next 11 months.

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

52 Responses to “… Gone!”

  1. Vanessa Edwards Foster says:

    Kelly’s got a husband???

  2. Fireshow says:

    I know how to stop smok­ing!
    I’ve done it already!!!
    I’m not a smoker now!!!
    You can do it too!!!
    This helped me!!! and can help you too.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply