Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

Chuck May Not Be Out; Kelly May Not Be In

Here’s sec­tion 145.001 of the Texas Elec­tion Code:

§ 145.001. METHOD FOR WITHDRAWAL AS CANDIDATE. (a) To with­draw from an elec­tion, a can­di­date whose name is to appear on the bal­lot must request that the candidate’s name be omit­ted from the bal­lot.
(b) To be effec­tive, a with­drawal request must:
(1) be in writ­ing and be signed and acknowl­edged by the can­di­date; and
(2) be timely filed with the appro­pri­ate author­ity as pro­vided by this code.
(c) A with­drawal request filed by mail is con­sid­ered to be filed at the time of its receipt by the appro­pri­ate author­ity.
(d) The time of a with­drawal is the time that an effec­tive with­drawal request is filed.
(e) This sec­tion does not apply to a can­di­date for pres­i­dent or vice-president of the United States.

Here’s Chuck Rosenthal’s let­ter ask­ing the party chair­man to with­draw his nom­i­na­tion.

You’ll notice that:

1. It does not request that his name be omit­ted from the bal­lot; and

2. It is signed but not acknowledged.

So it would appear that Chuck did not legally with­draw from the elec­tion. And if Chuck didn’t legally with­draw from the elec­tion, then the fil­ing dead­line was not extended beyond yes­ter­day. And if the fil­ing dead­line was not extended beyond yes­ter­day, then Kelly Siegler’s attempt to be added to the bal­lot was untimely.

So, for Har­ris County DA, it’ll be Jim Leit­ner vs. Chuck Rosenthal.

You heard it here first (and, to give credit where due I heard it first from über­lawyer, election-code guru, and, most impor­tantly, my lawyer: Troy McK­in­ney).

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

Leave a non-anonymous Reply