Defending People

the tao of criminal-defense trial lawyering

No More Jury Probation for Murder in Texas

I men­tioned here that a Texas jury could, when set­ting pun­ish­ment, make a bind­ing rec­om­men­da­tion of pro­ba­tion in almost any case in which (a) the the sen­tence was ten years or less and (b) the accused had not been con­victed of a felony or placed on felony pro­ba­tion before. This was true even in mur­der cases.

There are some cases in which a per­son can com­mit mur­der and rea­son­ably be placed on pro­ba­tion. In jury selec­tion on mur­der cases, pros­e­cu­tors often gave the exam­ple of the elderly man giv­ing his ail­ing wife too much mor­phine to end her pain. That’s a rare sit­u­a­tion; more com­mon is the case in which the accused had just enough of a part in the killing to be liable under the law of par­ties, but didn’t par­tic­i­pate directly. Here is one such case from six weeks ago, in which the jury found pro­ba­tion appropriate.

Juries could, after con­sid­er­ing all of the cir­cum­stances, decide whether the mur­derer deserved life in prison or pro­ba­tion or (most often) some­thing in between; that deci­sion was entirely up to them. They didn’t do it often, but only when the accused was very deserv­ing. I know of no prob­lems with that sys­tem. I never heard of a sin­gle per­son on pro­ba­tion for mur­der reof­fend­ing; there was cer­tainly not an epi­demic of such recidivism.

But the Texas Leg­is­la­ture decided that jury-recommended pro­ba­tion for mur­der was a prob­lem that needed solv­ing. They passed a pack­age of “pro­ba­tion reform” in Texas House Bill 1678 (PDF), and as of Sep­tem­ber 1, 2007, juries will be no longer have the power to rec­om­mend pro­ba­tion for peo­ple con­victed of murder.

Feh,” I hear my east coast brethren say­ing, “so what? Our juries don’t even have the power to set pun­ish­ment. Rec­om­mend pro­ba­tion? For a mur­derer? Fuhged­d­a­boutit!”

I like mur­der cases. There is no type of case I would rather defend, partly because there is so much at stake, partly because the State is throw­ing its best at me, and partly because there are so many pos­si­ble ways to win. Tak­ing away the jury’s power to put one of my clients on pro­ba­tion if it con­victs him nar­rows the field of sat­is­fac­tory results con­sid­er­ably. Not only can the jury not put my client on pro­ba­tion, but the nar­rowed range will cre­ate psy­cho­log­i­cal pres­sure on the jury to give a higher sentence.

But the big “so what” is this: the jury is a check on gov­ern­men­tal power. Now, thanks to the Texas Leg­is­la­ture, Texas juries have less power. Less power for the jury means more power for the gov­ern­ment. And, as you know, more power for the gov­ern­ment means less free­dom for the people.

[Edit: the law change applies only to mur­ders com­mit­ted after Sep­tem­ber 1, 2007. So…]

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , ,

Share

About The Author

Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

2 Responses to “No More Jury Probation for Murder in Texas”

  1. Jamie says:

    re: [Edit: the law change applies only to mur­ders com­mit­ted after Sep­tem­ber 1, 2007. So…]

    Haha. “So…”

    I’m tempted to won­der out loud how the rest of that ellip­sis reads…

    So…you’re say­ing I’ve only got 3 weeks left, hunh?”

  2. Mark Bennett says:

    Some things are bet­ter left elided.

Leave a non-anonymous Reply